Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-wr9vw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T22:21:15.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel’s Spiritual Beauty and Schiller’s Tragic Heroines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2025

Rachel Falkenstern
Rachel Falkenstern*
Affiliation:
St Francis College, New York City, USA
Get access

Abstract

Despite Hegel’s great admiration for Schiller and Schiller’s influence on Hegel’s philosophy of art, Hegel rarely praises Schiller’s tragedies and is indeed often critical of Schiller’s dramatic works. These criticisms for the most part concern characters who fail to live up to Hegel’s criteria for tragic heroes, as they vacillate, come to an unheroic demise, or are inwardly conflicted about their aims or actions. Despite these criticisms, this article argues that some of Schiller’s tragic heroines are nonetheless beautiful by Hegel’s own lights. Using Schiller’s Mary Stuart (1800) and The Maid of Orleans (1801), I argue that a deep spiritual beauty is exemplified in Schiller’s Joan of Arc and Mary Stuart, who overcome an inner conflict to achieve spiritual reconciliation, affording us the experience of Hegel’s ideal. Schiller’s tragic heroines present the beautiful triumph of an individual’s subjective freedom over great spiritual conflict, which is Hegel’s definition of artistic beauty. It is hoped that this article offers a new perspective not only on Hegel’s philosophy of art, but also on the power and beauty of Schiller’s tragic heroines.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , First View , pp. 1 - 19
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alznauer, M. (2020), ‘Hegel on Aesthetic Reconciliation’, in Bird-Pollan, S. and Marchenkov, V. (eds.), Hegel’s Political Aesthetics: Art in Modern Society. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Billings, J. (2014), Genealogy of the Tragic: Greek Tragedy and German Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. O. (2008), ‘The Legacy of Aesthetic Holism: Hamann, Herder, and Schiller’, Philosophical Legacies: Essays on the Thought of Kant, Hegel, and Their Contemporaries, Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 50: 67–92.Google Scholar
Falkenstern, R. (2020), ‘Hegel on Sophocles’ Oedipus the King and the Moral Accountability of Ancient Tragic Heroes’, Hegel Bulletin 41:2: .10.1017/hgl.2018.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstern, R. (2021a), ‘The Feminist Potential of Hegel’s Tragic Heroines’, in Achella, S., Iannelli, F., Baptist, G., Feloj, S., Vigni, F. Li and Melica, C. (eds.), The Owl’s Flight: Hegel’s Legacy to Contemporary Philosophy. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Falkenstern, R. (2021b), ‘Freedom and Fixity in Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes’, in Alznauer, M. (ed.), Hegel, Tragedy, and Comedy: New Essays. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
Fiala, A. G. (2010), ‘Aesthetic Education and the Aesthetic State: Hegel’s Response to Schiller’, in Maker, W. (ed.), Hegel and Aesthetics. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1967), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1971), ‘The Spirit of Christianity and its Fate’, in Hegel, Early Theological Writings, with an Introduction & Fragments, trans. Knox, T. M. and Kroner, R.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2005), ‘On Wallenstein’, trans. Geiger, I., Idealist Studies 35:2/3: .Google Scholar
Hinderer, W. (1991), ‘Introduction’, in Schiller, Wallenstein [and] Mary Stuart. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hoffheimer, M. H. (1985), ‘The Influence of Schiller’s Theory of Nature on Hegel’s Philosophical Development’, Journal of the History of Ideas 46: .10.2307/2709636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2021), ‘Hegel’s Aesthetics’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), ed. E. N., Zalta. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/hegel-aesthetics.Google Scholar
Moland, L. (2011), ‘An Unrelieved Heart: Hegel, Tragedy, and Schiller’s Wallenstein’, New German Critique 38:113: 1–23.10.1215/0094033X-1221767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moland, L. (2019), Hegel’s Aesthetics: The Art of Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190847326.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2011), ‘The Status of Literature in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: On the Lives of Concepts’, in Gray, R. T., Halmi, N., Handwerk, G., Rosenthal, M. A. and Vieweg, K. (eds.), Inventions of the Imagination: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Imaginary since Romanticism. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. (2005), Wallenstein: Text und Kommentar. Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Williams, R. R. (2012), Tragedy, Recognition, and the Death of God: Studies in Hegel and Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656059.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar