Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-9xpg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T02:29:22.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contested or competitive multilateralism? A reply to Julia C. Morse and Robert O. Keohane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

GRÁINNE DE BÚRCA
GRÁINNE DE BÚRCA*
Affiliation:
School of Law, New York University, 40 Washington Square South, New York, NY 10012
*
*Email: deburcag@mercury.law.nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Special Articles
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 320 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Morse, J and Keohane, RO, ‘Contested Multilateralism’ (2014) 9 Review of International Organizations 38510.1007/s11558-014-9188-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Krisch, N, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228317.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Berman, P, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’ (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review 1155Google Scholar.

4 Martti Koskenniemi led and finalised the report of the Study Group of the UN International Law Commission, entitled Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law A/CN.4/L.682 13 April 2006. See also Trachtman, J ‘Fragmentation, Coherence and Synergy in International Law’ (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 50510.5235/TLT.2.4.505CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Helfer, L, ‘Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking’ (2004) 29 Yale Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar.

6 Raustiala, K and Victor, D, ‘The Regime Complex for Genetic Plant Resources’ (2004) 58 International Organization 277.10.1017/S0020818304582036CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Alter, K and Meunier, S, ‘The Politics of Regime Complexity’ (2009) 7 Perspectives on Politics 1310.1017/S1537592709090033CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Halliday, T and Shaffer, G, Transnational Legal Orders (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2016).Google Scholar

9 Walker, N, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).10.1017/9781316134221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Agreement between the United Nations and the World Intellectual Property Organization of 27 September 1974, available at <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=305623>.

11 See for discussion Eckert, S and Biersteker, T, ‘Due Process and Targeted Sanctions: An Update of the “Watson Report”’ (Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University and The Graduate Institute, Geneva, 2012)Google Scholar.