Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-29T16:03:15.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Traprain Law Phonolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. G. MacGregor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Are-examination of the trachytoid phonolite of Traprain Law was undertaken on the suggestion of Mr. E. B. Bailey, in order to determine the characteristics and mode of occurrence of the nepheline contained in it. The slides examined were those of the Geological Survey collection and nine new ones specially cut from material recently obtained. During the course of the examination sodalite and olivine were detected in the rock. These minerals have not been mentioned in previous accounts of the petrography of Traprain Law, and sodalite seems to have been described in only one other rock from the British Isles (14).

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 59 , Issue 11 , November 1922 , pp. 514 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1)Bailey, E. B., in “The Geology of East Lothian”: Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Scotland, 1910, p. 128.Google Scholar
(2)Derby, O. A., “On Nepheline Rocks in Brazil, with special reference to the association of Phonolite and Foyaite”: Quart. Joum. Geol. Soc., vol. xliii, 1887, p. 457.Google Scholar
(3)Gemmell, A., “Chemical Analyses of Borolanite and Related Rocks”: Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. ix, pt. v, 1910.Google Scholar
(4)Hatch, F. H., “A New British Phonolite”: GEOL. MAG., 1892, p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Hatch, F. H., “Lower Carboniferous Rocks of East Lothian (Garlton Hills)”: Trans. Royal Soc. Edin., vol. xxxvii, 1892, p. 124.Google Scholar
(6)Hillebrand, W. F., “The Analysis of Silicate and Carbonate Rocks”: Bulletin 422, United States Geol. Surv., 1910.Google Scholar
(7)von Lasaulx, A., “Petrographische Studien an den vulkanischen Gesteinen der Auvergne”: Neues Jahrbuch, 1872, pp. 351–7.Google Scholar
(8)McRobert, Lady, “Acid and Intermediate Intrusions and Associated Ash Necks in the Neighbourhood of Melrose”: Quart. Joum. Geol. Soc, vol. lxx, 1914, p. 303.Google Scholar
(9)Marshall, P., “Geology of Dunedin (New Zealand)”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.,. vol. lxii, 1906, p. 381.Google Scholar
(10)Möhl, H., “Über die mineralogische Constitution und Einteilung der Phonolite”: Neues Jahrbuch, 1874, pp. 38–43.Google Scholar
(11)Rosenbusch, H., “Mikroskopische Physiographie der Mineralien und Gesteine,” 1887.Google Scholar
(12)Rosenbusch, H., “Mikroskopische Physiographie der Mineralien und Gesteine,” 1896.Google Scholar
(13)Rosenbusch, H., “Mikroskopische Physiographie der Mineralien und Gesteine,” Band II, 2, Massigen Gesteine, Ergussgesteine, 1908.Google Scholar
(14)Shand, S. J., “On Borolanite and its Associates in Assynt” (Second Communication): Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. ix, pt. v, 1910, p. 402.Google Scholar