Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-22T06:14:11.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the San Andreas Fault System with the Highland Boundary Fault System of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. St J. Lambert  and
W. S. McKerrow
R. St J. Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
W. S. McKerrow
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Mineralogy, Parks Road, Oxford, England OX1 3PR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

There are close geometrical and dimensional similarities between the faults in Scotland north of the Highland Boundary Fault and faults in southern California east of the San Andreas Fault. It is argued that the Moine Thrust and Oarlock Fault are equivalents and that the Great Glen Fault and the Rosamund Lineament are also equivalent, implying corresponding senses of movement and that the Highland Boundary Fault originated as a dextral transform. The comparison cannot be extended yet to the terrains to the N of the Oarlock Fault or W of the San Andreas or to the corresponding areas in the Caledonides.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 115 , Issue 5 , September 1978 , pp. 367 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, J. G. C. & Owen, T. R. 1968. The Geological Structure of the British Isles. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Atwater, T. 1970. Implications of plate tectonic evolution of western North America. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 81, 3513–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, J. M. 1963. The Moine Thrust zone in the Assynt region, northwest Scotland. Publ. geol. Sci. Univ. Calif., 40, 345–440.Google Scholar
Davis, G. A. & Burchfiel, B. C. 1973. Garlock Fault: an intercontinental transform structure, southern California. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 84, 1407–22.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. F. 1969. Evolution of the Appalachian/Caledonian orogen. Nature, Lond. 222, 124–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. F. 1971. A model for the Lower Palaeozoic evolution of the southern margin of the southern Caledonides of Scotland and Ireland. Scott J. Geol. 7, 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. F. & Pankhurst, R. J. 1970. The evolution of the Scottish Caledonides in relation to their isotopic age pattern. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 68, 361–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibblee, T. W. Jr. 1967. Areal geology of the western Mojave Desert, California. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 522.Google Scholar
Dibblee, T. W. Jr. 1968. Displacements on the San Andreas fault system in the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains, southern California. Publ. geol. Sci. Stanford Univ. 11, 260–77.Google Scholar
Dickinson, W. R. & Grantz, A. 1968. Proceedings of conference on geologic problems of San Andreas fault system. Publ. geol. Sci. Stanford Univ. 11.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1971. Tectonic transgression in Caledonian Spitzburgen. Geol. Mag. 108, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, C. W. 1975. Fault Map of California 1:750,000, California Division Mines Geology.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. Q. 1946. The Great Glen Fault. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 102, 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R. St J. & McKerrow, W. S. 1976. The Grampian orogeny. Scott. J. Geol. 12, 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, D. P. & Morgan, W. J. 1969. Evolution of triple junctions. Nature, Lond. 224, 125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuillin, R. & Binns, P. E. 1973. Continental structure in the Sea of the Hebrides. Nature Phys. Sci. 241, 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max, M. D. & Riddihough, R. P. 1975. Continuation of the Highland Boundary fault in Ireland. Geology, 3, 206–10.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A. H. G. & McKerrow, W. S. 1975. Analogous evolution of the Burma orogen and the Scottish Caledonides. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 86, 305–15.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, G. B. 1955. Earthquakes in Kern County, California during 1952. Bull. Calif. Div. Mines 171.Google Scholar
Pease, R. W. & Johnson, C. W. 1973. Symposium on Significant Results Obtained from the Earth Resources Technology Satellite-I, vol. 1, sect. A, 547–52. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pitcher, W. S. & Berger, A. R. 1972. The Geology of Donegal, New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Powell, D. W. 1970. Magnetized rocks within the Lewisian of Scotland and under the Southern Uplands. Scott. J. Geol. 6, 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. 1962. Discussion of paper by R. Dearnley. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 118, 171–4.Google Scholar
Winchester, J. A. 1973. Pattern of regional metamorphism suggests a sinistral displacement of 160 km along the great Glen Fault. Nature, Lond. 246, 81–4. Google Scholar