Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-13T21:33:55.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World monies or money-worlds: A new perspective on cryptocurrencies and their moneyness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Adam Hayes
Adam Hayes*
Affiliation:
Hebrew University, Israel
*
Corresponding author: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. Email: Adam.Hayes@mail.huji.ac.il.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This essay makes the case that current debates about the ‘moneyness’ of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are occurring at the incorrect scale. Rather than being some form of transnational digital money to be used alongside or compete with national fiat currencies, I argue that, instead, each cryptocurrency represents its own self-contained ‘money-world’. Put differently, a cryptocurrency is the uniquely specified unit of account and medium of exchange within the socio-technical bounds of its own blockchain. This new perspective can open new lines of intellectual dialogue and inform better policy choices for regulating cryptocurrencies.

Keywords

Bitcoincryptocurrencymoneyblockchain

Information

Type
Essay
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , 2021 , pp. 130 - 139
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2021 The Author(s)

References

Ammous, S. (2018) The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bjerg, O. (2016) How is Bitcoin money? Theory, Culture & Society, 33(1): 53–72.Google Scholar
Buterin, V. (2015) Visions, part I: The value of blockchain technology. Available at: <https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/04/13/visions-part-1-the-value-of-blockchain-technology/>. Accessed 25 February 2021..+Accessed+25+February+2021.>Google Scholar
Ciaian, P. and Rajcaniova, M. (2016) The digital agenda of virtual currencies: Can BitCoin become a global currency? Information Systems and e-Business Management, 14(4): 883–919.Google Scholar
DeFilippi, P. and Wright, A. (2018) Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, N. (2018) The social life of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(3): 35–56.Google Scholar
Duque, J.J. (2020) State involvement in cryptocurrencies. A potential world money? Japanese Political Economy, 46(1): 65–82.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2011) Debt: The First Five Thousand Years. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (1978) Denationalisation of Money: The Argument Redefined. London: IEA.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. (2019) The socio-technological lives of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(4): 49–72.Google Scholar
Ingham, G. (2013) The Nature of Money. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
James, J.Q., Lam, A.Y. and Lu, Z. (2018) Double auction-based pricing mechanism for autonomous vehicle public transportation system. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 3(2): 151–62.Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (2020) The Internet of Things: Social dimensions. Sociology Compass, 14(4): e12770.Google Scholar
Luu, L., Chu, D.H., Olickel, H., Saxena, P. and Hobor, A. (2016) Making smart contracts smarter. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM-SIGSAC Conference. New York: ACM, 254–69.Google Scholar
Lyons, R.K. and Viswanath-Natraj, G. (2020) What keeps stablecoins stable? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, no. 27136.Google Scholar
Mala, E. (2018) Who spends $140,000 on a CryptoKitty. The New York Times, 18 May.Google Scholar
Maurer, B. (2006) The anthropology of money. Annual Review of Anthropoogy, 35: 15–36.Google Scholar
Maurer, B., Nelms, T.C., and Swartz, L. (2013) “When perhaps the real problem is money itself!”: The practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics, 23(2): 261–77.Google Scholar
Mikolajewicz-Wozniak, A. and Scheibe, A. (2015) Virtual currency schemes-the future of financial services. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 17(4): 365.Google Scholar
Miraz, M.H. and Donald, D.C. (2019) Atomic cross-chain swaps: Development, trajectory, and potential of non-monetary digital token swap facilities. Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing, 3(1): 42–50.Google Scholar
Nakamoto S. (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Available at: <https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf/>. Accessed 25 February 2021..+Accessed+25+February+2021.>Google Scholar
Norta, A. (2015) Creation of smart-contracting collaborations for decentralized autonomous organizations. In: Matulevicius, R. and Dumas, M. (eds.) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 3–17.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1891) Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Scharding, T. (2019) National currency, world currency, cryptocurrency: A Fichtean approach to the ethics of Bitcoin. Business and Society Review, 124(2): 219–38.Google Scholar
Seetharaman, A., Saravanan, A.S., Patwa, N. and Mehta, J. (2017) Impact of Bitcoin as a world currency. Accounting and Finance Research, 6(2): 230–46.Google Scholar
Serada, A., Sihvonen, T. and Harviainen, J.T. (2020) CryptoKitties and the new ludic economy: How blockchain introduces value, ownership, and scarcity in digital gaming. Games and Culture, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019898305.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (2004 [1900]) The Philosophy of Money. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2020) Smart infrastructure for future urban mobility. AI Magazine, 41(1): 5–18.Google Scholar
Swartz, L. (2018). What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology. Cultural Studies, 32(4): 623–50.Google Scholar
Szabo, N. (1999) Micropayments and mental transaction costs. 2nd Berlin Internet Economics Workshop, 44: 44.Google Scholar
Tasca, P., Hayes, A. and Liu, S. (2018) The evolution of the bitcoin economy: extracting and analyzing the network of payment relationships. The Journal of Risk Finance, 19(2): 94–126.Google Scholar
Tatzel, M. (2002) “Money worlds” and well-being: An integration of money dispositions, materialism and price-related behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1): 103–26.Google Scholar
Wray, L.R. (1998) Understanding Modern Money. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Yermack, D. (2015) Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal. In: Chuen, D.L.K. (ed.) Handbook of Digital Currency. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 31–43.Google Scholar
Zhou, S., Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Kutan, A.M. (2008) Purchasing power parity before and after the adoption of the Euro. Review of World Economics, 144(1): 134–50.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Z. (2017) Bitcoin and Potosí silver: Historical perspectives on cryptocurrency. Technology and Culture, 58(2): 307–34.Google ScholarPubMed