Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-10T21:32:10.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The logic of leverage: Reflections on post-foundational political economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Martijn Konings
Martijn Konings*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Martijn Konings, Department ofPolitical Economy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email:martijn.konings@sydney.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This rejoinder takes up some of the points that have been raised by the reviews of Capital and Time in this forum. It engages the question of how political economy should position itself vis-à-vis concerns about the dangers of essentialism and teleological explanation. It argues that a proper theorization of the logic of ‘leverage’ is key to the development of a political economy that appropriates the insights of post-foundational theory but is still able to account for the reality of power and inequality.

Information

Type
Forum: Capital and time
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 2018 , pp. 205 - 213
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2018 The Author(s)

References

Best, J. (2018) Recovering the mundane practices of economic time. Finance and Society, 4(2): 181–87.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1984) Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feher, M. (2009) Self-appreciation; or, the aspirations of human capital. Public Culture, 21(1): 21–41.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Knafo, S. (2013) The Making of Modern Finance: Liberal Governance and the Gold Standard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Konings, M. (2011) The Development of American Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Konings, M. (2015a) The Emotional Logic of Capitalism: What Progressives Have Missed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Konings, M. (2015b) Historicising finance. Progress in Political Economy [Blog], 5 October. Available at: <http://ppesydney.net/historicising-finance/>. Accessed 8 November 2018..+Accessed+8+November+2018.>Google Scholar
Konings, M. (2015c) What is constructivism for? Progress in Political Economy [Blog], 18 February. Available at: <http://ppesydney.net/what-is-constructivism-for/>. Accessed 8 November 2018..+Accessed+8+November+2018.>Google Scholar
Konings, M. (2018) Capital and Time: For a New Critique of Neoliberal Reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
La Berge, L.C. (2018) Money is time: On the possibility of critique after neoliberalism. Finance and Society, 4(2): 199–204.Google Scholar
Sgambati, S. (2015) Rethinking banking: Debt discounting and the making of modern money as liquidity. New Political Economy, 21(3): 274–90.Google Scholar
Thiemann, M. (2018) On the constitutive effects of contingent associations. Finance and Society, 4(2): 193–98.Google Scholar
Vogl, J. (2014) The sovereignty effect: Markets and power in the economic regime. Qui Parle, 23(1): 125–55.Google Scholar
Wansleben, L. (2018) Luhmann without society. Finance and Society, 4(2): 188–92.Google Scholar