Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T21:46:22.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The economic effects of Facebook

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Roberto Mosquera ,
Mofioluwasademi Odunowo ,
Trent McNamara ,
Xiongfei Guo  and
Ragan Petrie Open the ORCID record for Ragan Petrie [Opens in a new window]
Roberto Mosquera*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Universidad de las Americas, De los Granados E12-41 y Colimes esquina Quito, Ecuador
Mofioluwasademi Odunowo*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Texas A&M University, 4228 TAMU, 77843 College Station, TX, USA
Trent McNamara*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Texas A&M University, 4228 TAMU, 77843 College Station, TX, USA
Xiongfei Guo*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Texas A&M University, 4228 TAMU, 77843 College Station, TX, USA
Ragan Petrie*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Texas A&M University, 4228 TAMU, 77843 College Station, TX, USA
*
roberto.mosquera@udla.edu.ec
moffii.odunowo@tamu.edu
trent_mcnamara@tamu.edu
guoxiongfei620@tamu.edu
rpetrie@tamu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social media permeates many aspects of our lives, including how we connect with others, where we get our news and how we spend our time. Yet, we know little about the economic effects for users. In 2017, we ran a large field experiment with over 1765 individuals to document the value of Facebook to users and its causal effect on news, well-being and daily activities. Participants reveal how much they value one week of Facebook usage and are then randomly assigned to a validated Facebook restriction or normal use. One week of Facebook is worth $67. Those who are off Facebook for one week reduce news consumption, are less likely to recognize politically-skewed news stories, report being less depressed and engage in healthier activities. These results are strongest for men. Our results further suggest that, after the restriction, Facebook’s value increases, consistent with information loss or that using Facebook may be addictive.

Keywords

Social mediaField experimentValue of FacebookNews awarenessWell-beingGender

JEL classification

I31: General Welfare, Well-Being C93: Field Experiments D91: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making‡ D83: Search • Learning • Information and Knowledge • Communication • Belief • Unawareness

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 575 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09625-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Abadie, A (2002). Bootstrap tests for distributional treatment effects in instrumental variable models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(457), 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2019). The welfare effects of social media. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, H, & Gentzkow, M (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, ML (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, C, & Tuten, T (2015). Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology & Marketing, 32(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, M, Cao, R, Kuchler, T, & Stroebel, J (2017). The economic effects of social networks: Evidence from the housing market. Journal of Political Economy, 126(6), 2224–2276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, M, Cao, R, Kuchler, T, Stroebel, J, & Wong, A (2018). Social connectedness: Measurement, determinants, and effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), 259–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, GM, Degroot, MH, & Marschak, J (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, GS, & Murphy, KM (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Y, & Hochberg, Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Y, Krieger, AM, & Yekutieli, D (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93(3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, H, Mo, P, Malik, S, & Thomas, S (2009). How effective are physical activity interventions for alleviating depressive symptoms in older people? A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(10), 873–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohm, P, Lindén, J, & Sonnegåd, J (1997). Eliciting reservation prices: Becker–Degroot–Marschak mechanisms versus markets. The Economic Journal, 107(443), 1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, RM, Fariss, CJ, Jones, JJ, Kramer, AD, Marlow, C, Settle, JE, & Fowler, JH (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brynjolfsson, E., Eggers, F., & Gannamaneni, A. (2018). Using massive online chohice experiments to measure changes in well-being. NBER Working Paper 24514.Google Scholar
Corrigan, JR, Alhabash, S, Rousu, M, & Cash, SB (2018). How much is social media worth? Estimating the value of Facebook by paying users to stop using it. PloS One, 13(12), e0207101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, S., & Inkster, B. (2017). Status of mind social media and young people’s mental health and wellbeing. Royal Society for Public Health.Google Scholar
De Vries, L, Gensler, S, & Leeflang, PS (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna, S, & Kaplan, E (2007). The fox news effect: Media bias and voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1187–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deloitte. (2015). Facebook’s global economic impact: A report for facebook.Google Scholar
Deters, Fg, & Mehl, MR (2013). Does posting facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 579–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellison, NB, Steinfield, C, & Lampe, C (2007). The benefits of facebook ”friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EMarketeer. (2015). College students still spend most social time with facebook. Retrieved December 25, 2017 from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/College-Students-Still-Spend-Most-Social-Time-with-Facebook/1012955.Google Scholar
Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2016). Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Facebook. (2016). Facebook reports first quarter 2016 results.Google Scholar
Facebook. (2017). Facebook reports third quarter 2017 results.Google Scholar
Feinstein, BA, Hershenberg, R, Bhatia, V, Latack, JA, Meuwly, N, & Davila, J (2013). Negative social comparison on facebook and depressive symptoms: Rumination as a mechanism. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(3), 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, S., King, M., Ruggles, S., & Warren, J. R. (2017). Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: Version 5.0. dataset, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. https://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V5.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, BL, & Joiner, T (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentzkow, M, & Shapiro, JM (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, AL, & Hancock, JT (2011). Mirror, mirror on my facebook wall: Effects of exposure to facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016.Google Scholar
Gruber, J, & Köszegi, B (2001). Is addiction ”Rational”? Theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1261–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, B (2018). Valuation of digital platforms: Experimental evidence for google and facebook. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(4), 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, JK (2006). The Becker–DeGroot–Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods. Economics Letters, 93(1), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelenchick, LA, Eickho, JC, & Moreno, MA (2013). Facebook depression? Social networking site use and depression in older adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(1), 128–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D, & Krueger, AB (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D, Krueger, AB, Schkade, DA, Schwarz, N, & Stone, AA (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kettunen, O (2015). Effects of physical activity and fitness on the psychological wellbeing of young men and working adults: Associations with stress, mental resources, overweight and workability, Turku: Annales universitas turkuensis, medica-odontologica.Google Scholar
Kim, J, & Lee, J (2011). The facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knetsch, JL, Tang, F-F, & Thaler, RH (2001). The endowment effect and repeated market trials: Is the Vickrey auction demand revealing?. Experimental Economics, 4(3), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, AB, & Schkade, DA (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8), 1833–1845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laroche, M, Habibi, MR, Richard, M-O, & Sankaranarayanan, R (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1755–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, CS, & Ma, L (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, GJ, & Yurukoglu, A (2017). Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2565–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, A, & Puller, SL (2008). The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazar, N, Koszegi, B, & Ariely, D (2014). True context-dependent preferences? The causes of market-dependent valuations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3), 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullainathan, S, & Shleifer, A (2005). The market for news. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1031–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscanell, NL, & Guadagno, RE (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, DB, Tay, L, & Diener, E (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD Better Life Initiative. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being.Google Scholar
Ostir, GV, Markides, KS, Black, SA, & Goodwin, JS (2000). Emotional well-being predicts subsequent functional independence and survival. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48(5), 473–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neil, A, Quirk, SE, Housden, S, Brennan, SL, Williams, LJ, Pasco, JA, Berk, M, & Jacka, FN (2014). Relationship between diet and mental health in children and adolescents: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 104(10), e31–e42 PMID: 25208008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center, Pew Research. (2016). Social media update 2016.Google Scholar
Center, Pew Research. (2018). Social media use 2018.Google Scholar
Plott, CR, & Zeiler, K (2005). The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the ”endowment effect”, subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. The American Economic Review, 95(3), 530–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezaee, M, Hedayati, A, Naghizadeh, MM, Farjam, M, Sabet, HR, & Paknahad, M (2016). Correlation between happiness and depression according to beck depression and oxford happiness inventory among university students. Galen Medical Journal, 5(2), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagioglou, C, & Greitemeyer, T (2014). Facebook’s emotional consequences: Why facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it?. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salovey, P, Rothman, AJ, Detweiler, JB, & Steward, WT (2000). Emotional states and physical health. American Psychologist, 55(1), 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seow, DY, Haaland, B, & Jafar, TH (2015). The association of prehypertension with meals eaten away from home in young adults in singapore. American Journal of Hypertension, 28(10), 1197–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakya, HB, & Christakis, NA (2017). Association of facebook use with compromised well-being: A longitudinal study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185(3), 203–211.Google ScholarPubMed
Sonnentag, S (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(3), 196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statista. (2018). Frequency of facebook use in the united states as of february 2018 by gender. Retrieved June 23, 2018 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/653014/frequency-usage-facebook-usa-gender/.Google Scholar
Steers, M-LN, Wickham, RE, & Acitelli, LK (2014). Seeing everyone else’s highlight reels: How facebook usage is linked to depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(8), 701–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, CR (2019). Valuing Facebook. Behavioural Public Policy, 10.1017/bpp.2018.34Google Scholar
Tandoc, EC, Ferrucci, P, & Duy, M (2015). Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing?. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Neilsen Company. (2016). 2016 neilsen social media report. The Neilsen Company.Google Scholar
Tromholt, M (2016). The facebook experiment: Quitting facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11), 661–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuttle, B. (2012). How much you spend each year on Coffee, Gas, Christmas, Pets, Beer, and More. TIME Magazine. Retrieved December 25, 2017 from http://business.time.com/2012/01/23/how-much-you-spend-each-year-on-coffee-gas-christmas-pets-beer-and-more/.Google Scholar
Urban, LE, Weber, JL, Heyman, MB, Schichtl, RL, Verstraete, S, Lowery, NS, Das, SK, Schleicher, MM, Rogers, G, Economos, C et al., (2016). Energy contents of frequently ordered restaurant meals and comparison with human energy requirements and us department of agriculture database information: A multisite randomized study. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(4), 590–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenzuela, S, Park, N, & Kee, KF (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshavsky, JR, Morello-Frosch, R, Woodruff, TJ, & Zota, AR (2018). Dietary sources of cumulative phthalates exposure among the us general population in nhanes 2005–2014. Environment International, 115, 417–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verduyn, P, Lee, DS, Park, J, Shablack, H, Orvell, A, Bayer, J, Ybarra, O, Jonides, J, & Kross, E (2015). Passive facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, EA, Rose, JP, Okdie, BM, Eckles, K, & Franz, B (2015). Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, JA, & Bleich, SN (2015). Is cooking at home associated with better diet quality or weight-loss intention?. Public Health Nutrition, 18(8), 1397–1406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Mosquera et al. supplementary material

Mosquera et al. supplementary material
Download Mosquera et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.7 MB