Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-br6xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T01:01:52.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Value Auctions with Default: An Experimental Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Matthew R. Roelofs
Matthew R. Roelofs*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225-9074
*
email: matthew.roelofs@wwu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines a common value auction in which bidder default is explicitly allowed. The lack of contractual enforcement has implications for the formation of bids as well as the revenue properties of the auction. Using a common value procurement auction, we explore these implications in an experimental setting. Our results show that bidders are more aggressive when default is allowed. A theoretical result shows that allowing default can actually be in the best interest of the auctioneer. Experimental evidence, however, indicates that this result does not hold true in practice. One possible reason for this discrepancy is that the data in our experiments is consistent with winner's curse behavior.

Keywords

common value auctionwinner's cursedefaultlimited liabilityexperimental economics

JEL classification

D44: Auctions C90: General L14: Transactional Relationships • Contracts and Reputation • Networks

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , December 2002 , pp. 233 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cox, J.C. and Smith, V.L. (1992). “Endogenous Entry and Exit in Common Value Auctions.” Mimeo, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Gruley, B. and Hardy, Q. (1997). “Wireless Bidders Ask to Restructure Debt—Firms Say They Can't Pay $10.2 Billion Due FCC And Threaten Default.” Wall Street Journal. June 26, (A3).Google Scholar
Hansen, R.G. and Lott, J.R. (1991). “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment.” American Economic Review. 81, 347–361.Google Scholar
Harstad, R.M. and Rothkopf, M.H. (1995). “Withdrawable Winning Bids as Winner's Curse Insurance.” Operations Research. 43, 983–994.10.1287/opre.43.6.983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbsman, Z. and Ellis, R. (1992). “Multiparameter Bidding System—Innovation in Contract Administration.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 118, 142–150.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:1(142)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C.A. and Sherman, R. (2000). “Risk Aversion and the Winner's Curse.” Discussion paper, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Ioannou, P.G. and Leu, S. (1993). “Average-Bid Method—Competitive Bidding Strategy.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 119, 131–147.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:1(131)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagel, J.H. and Levin, D. (1986). “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions.” American Economic Review. 76, 894–920.Google Scholar
Kagel, J.H. and Levin, D. (1991). “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Reply.” American Economic Review. 81, 362–369.Google Scholar
Lind, B. and Plott, C.R. (1991). “The Winner's Curse: Experiments with Buyers and Sellers.” American Economic Review. 81, 335–346.Google Scholar
Myerson, R.B. (1991). Game Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 132–136.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. (1991). “Rethinking the Competitive Bid.” Civil Engineering. 61, 66–68.Google Scholar
Rothkopf, M.H. (1991). “On Auctions with Withdrawable Winning Bids.” Marketing Science. 10, 40–57.10.1287/mksc.10.1.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarricone, P. (1993). “Deliverance.” Civil Engineering. 63, 36–39.Google Scholar
Van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C. and Beil, R.O. (1990). “Tacit Coordination Games, Strategic Uncertainty, and Coordination Failure.” American Economic Review. 80, 234–248.Google Scholar
Von Ungern-Sternberg, T. (1991). “Swiss Auctions.” Economica. 58, 341–357.10.2307/2554821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waehrer, K. (1995). “A Model of Auction Contracts with Liquidated Damages.” Journal of Economic Theory. 67, 531–555.10.1006/jeth.1995.1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, C.Z. (2001). “High Bids and Broke Winners.” Journal of Economic Theory. 100, 129–171.10.1006/jeth.2000.2715CrossRefGoogle Scholar