Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T07:39:25.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Water Relations of Barley Grown Continually or After Fallow Under Semi-Arid Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. I. Orphanos  and
C. Metochis
P. I. Orphanos
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
C. Metochis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Grain barley was grown either continually or in rotation with fallow in a 12-year experiment. Annual rainfall ranged from 120 to 297 mm. As the water requirement of the crop is 240 mm, growth in most seasons occurred under water stress. The amount of water conserved under fallow was only significant (75–100 mm) in three of the 12 years and only once did the water conserved increase barley yield in the following year. The total grain yield over the experimental period was twice as high in the barley–barley sequence as in the barley–fallow sequence.

Cultiuo continuo de cebada o después de barbecho

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1994 , pp. 431 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Black, T. A., Gardner, W. G. & Thurtell, G. W. (1969). The prediction of evaporation, drainage and soil water storage for a bare soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 33:655–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. C., Keatinge, J. D. H., Gregory, P. J. & Cooper, P. J. M. (1987). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in northern Syria. 1. Root and shoot growth. Field Crops Research 16:53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Gregory, P. J., Tully, D. & Harris, H. C. (1987 a). Improving water use efficiency of annual crops in the rainfed farming systems of West Asia and North Africa. Experimental Agriculture 23:113–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Gregory, P. J., Keatinge, J. D. H. & Brown, S. C. (1987 b). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in Northern Syria. 2. Soil water dynamics and crop water use. Field Crops Research 16:67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wit, C. T. (1966). Photosynthesis of crop surfaces. Advances in Science 23:159–162.Google Scholar
Droushiotis, D. & Wilman, D. (1987). Effects of harvesting programme and sowing date on the forage yield, digestibility, nitrogen concentration, tillers and crop fractions of barley in Cyprus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R. J. & Schultz, J. E. (1984). Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35:743–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1976). Effects of drought on grain growth. Nature 264:541–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1982). The effects of annual precipitation and its distribution on grain yield of dryland cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99:251–270.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1987). The effects of optimum heading date and its stability on yield and consistency of performance of barley and durum wheat in dry areas. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108:599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. J. & Wahbi, A. (1992). Site-factor influence on barley response to fertilizer in on-farm trials in northern Syria: descriptive and predictive models. Experimental Agriculture 28:63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krentos, V. D. & Orphanos, P. I. (1979). Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers for wheat and barley in a semi-arid region. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93:711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, L. (1946). Some aspects of soil fertility in Cyprus. The Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 14:123–134.Google Scholar
Metochis, Chr. (1979). The agroclimatology of Athalassa farm. Technical Paper 17. Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
Orphanos, P. I. (1994). Performance of grain and hay barley in different rotations and fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. European Journal of Agronomy 3 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Williams, J. B. (1969). The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soil. V. Relationships between particle size composition and moisture contents at the upper and lower limits of available water. Journal of Soil Science 20:126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warder, F. G., Lehane, J. J., Hinman, W. C. & Staple, W. J. (1963). The effect of fertilizer on growth, nutrient uptake and moisture use of wheat on two soils in southwestern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 43:107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar