Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T13:46:08.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heat-induced Sterility in Cotton Sown During Early April in West Punjab†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

M. A. Taha ,
M. N. A. Malik ,
F. I. Chaudhry  and
M. I. Makhdum
M. A. Taha
Affiliation:
Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan
M. N. A. Malik
Affiliation:
Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan
F. I. Chaudhry
Affiliation:
Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan
M. I. Makhdum
Affiliation:
Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An experiment was conducted during the 1978/79 summer at the Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan-Pakistan to evaluate the crop production patterns of two cultivars of cotton (G. hirsutum L.) differing in their reaction to heat-induced sterility. Boll set in variety ST3 amounted to 7.7% of the total fruiting points, from flowers opening during the hottest months of June, July and early August, while almost all the fruiting points produced by cultivar B557 during the same period were shed and no bolls were set. Of the flowers examined during July, 83.3% in B557 contained non-dehiscent anthers against 6.7% in ST3.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 189 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Afzal, M. (1947). Growth and development of the cotton plant and its development in the Punjab. Final Rep. Punjab Bot. Res. Scheme, Lyallpur, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Brown, K. J. (1965). Response of three strains of cotton to flower removal. Cotton Growing Review 42:279–286.Google Scholar
Dale, J. E. (1962). Fruit shedding and yield in cotton. Empire Cotton Growing Review 39:170–176.Google Scholar
Fischer, W. D. (1973). Association of temperature and boll set. Proc. Beltwide Cott. Prod. Res. Conf. 72–73.Google Scholar
Fischer, W. D. (1975). Heat induced sterility in upland cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cott. Prod. Res. Conf. 85.Google Scholar
Hearn, A. B. (1976). In Agricultural Research for Development (Ed. Arnold, M. H.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hesketh, J. D. & Low, A. (1968). Effect of temperature on components of yield and fibre quality of cotton varieties of diverse origin. Cotton Growing Review 45:243–257.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. J. & Rawlins, S. L. (1970). Infertility of cotton flowers at both high and low relative humidities. Crop Science 10:721–723.Google Scholar
Khan, W. S. Abdulatif, Khan, A. R. & Soroya, R. A. (1975). B557–A new high yielding potential Punjab American (G. hirsutum) cotton. The Punjab Cottons 20:21–23.Google Scholar
Meyer, V. G. (1969). Some effects of genes, cytoplasm and environment on male sterility of cotton (Gossypium). Crop Science 9:237–242.Google Scholar
Munro, J. M. & Farbrother, H. G. (1969). Composite plant diagrams in cotton. Cotton Growing Review 46:261–282.Google Scholar
Patterson, L. L., Buxton, D. R. & Briggs, R. E. (1978). Fruiting in cotton as affected by controlled boll set. Agronomy Journal 70:118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, R. D. (1969). Effect of temperature on boll set and development of Gossypium hirsutum. Cotton Growing Review 46:29–36.Google Scholar
Taha, M. A., Chaudhry, F. I. & Makhdum, M. I. (1980). The influence of high temperature on the crop production pattern and fruit retention of three conventional cotton varieties (G. hirsutum L.) in Pakistan. The Pakistan Cottons 24:18–36.Google Scholar
Trought, T. (1931). A study of causes contributing to the large variation in yields from year to year of 4F cotton in the Punjab. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 1:309–350.Google Scholar