Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T17:22:29.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Techniques for Planting Sugarbeet to Advance the Harvest Date in North Indian Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. S. Narang  and
B. S. Bains
R. S. Narang
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
B. S. Bains
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Results of a two-year field study show that even under hot northern Indian conditions, sugar-beet planting dates can be advanced to 20 September to permit an early harvest from mid-March onwards. Seeding the crop on the northern side of east-west ridges gave root yields of 45–50 t ha−1 with a sucrose content of 12–14%. Transplanting gave the highest tonnage but led to a high incidence of branched tap roots. For timely planting during October, direct seeding in north–south rows was also satisfactory. Such staggered seeding and harvest schedules could help extend the milling period to 90–100 days as against the present 45–50 days.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 99 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1972–1973). Summary of Research Report. All India Coordinated Research Project on Sugarbeet ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Anon. (1980–1981). Summary of Research Report. All India Coordinated Research Project on Sugarbeet ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Brummer, V. (1975). Transplanting of pot-raised sugarbeet seedlings. Proc. 38th Inst. Int. de rech. Betteravieres, Winter Congress Session I. Report No. d. 1.Google Scholar
Buzanov, I. F., Makovetskii, K. A. & Budkovskaya, N. G. (1980). Effect of soil temperature and nitrogen nutrition of plants on productivity and chemical composition of sugarbeet. Field Crop Abstracts 33: 10376.Google Scholar
Deol, D. S. & Kanwar, R. S. (1975). Effect of the dates of sowing and harvesting on the yield and quality of sugarbeet. Crop Improv. 2: 105–111.Google Scholar
Dillon, M. A., McCaslin, B. D. & Schemhl, W. R. (1972). Effect of transplanting and cover on growth of sugarbeet. Agronomy Journal 64: 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubetz, S. & Russell, G. C. (1964). Soil temperature and nitrogen effect on yield and phosphorus uptake by sugarbeet. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technology 13: 238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebata, M. R., Aihoshi, K. & Hirohama, M. (1964). On the transplanting time and nursery periods of sugarbeet. Japanese Bulletin of Sugar Beet Research Supplement No. 4: 1–6.Google Scholar
Mathuria, R. S. & Bhoj, R. L. (1977). A note on sugarbeet cultivation in Western Uttar Pradesh. Cane Grower's Bulletin 3: 12–14.Google Scholar