Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T15:12:38.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Water, Nitrogen and Competition on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Field-grown Tepary Bean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Suzanne C. Nelson ,
Gary P. Nabhan  and
Robert H. Robichaux
Suzanne C. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Gary P. Nabhan
Affiliation:
Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Arizona 85008, USA
Robert H. Robichaux
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and yield components of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) were evaluated at Tucson, Arizona in 1987 and the effects of water and intercrop competition with Sonoran panicgrass (Panicum sonorum) in 1988. Total shoot biornass and reproductive yield were significantly reduced by lack of water in both seasons. Addition of nitrogen had no significant effect on total shoot biomass or reproductive yield in 1987. Intercrop competition significantly reduced total shoot biomass and reproductive yield of tepary bean in 1988. Yield component responses varied slightly depending on treatment and year.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Freeman, G. F. (1918). Southwestern beans and teparies. University of Arizona Experiment Station Bulletin 68:1–55 (revised).Google Scholar
Hendry, G. W. (1918). Bean culture in California. University of California Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 294.Google Scholar
Kramer, P. J. (1980). Drought, stress, and the origin of adaptations. In Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress, 7–19 (Eds Turner, N. C. and Kramer, P. J.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. G. (1980). Sexual strategies in plants I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytologist 86:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markhart, A. H. III. (1985). Comparative water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus acutifolius Gray. Plant Physiology 77:113–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, B. & Willey, R. W. (1983). Radiation interception and growth in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crops Research 7:141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabhan, G. P. & Felger, R. S. (1978). Teparies in southwestern North America: A biogeographical and ethnohistorical study of Phaseolus acutifolius. Economic Botany 32:2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, M. & Willey, R. W. (1980). Sorghum–pigeonpea intercropping and the effects of plant population density. I. Growth and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofori, F. & Stern, W. R. (1986). Maize/cowpea intercrop system: Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on productivity and efficiency. Field Crops Research 14:247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofori, F. & Stern, W. R. (1987). Cereal–legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41:41–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, M. R. & Willey, R. W. (1983). Effects of pigeonpea plant population and row arrangement in sorghum/pigeonpea intercropping. Field Crops Research 7:203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. V., Manshardt, R. M. & Waines, J. G. (1983). Teparies as a source of useful traits for improving common beans. Desert Plants 5:43–48.Google Scholar
Trang, K. M. & Giddens, J. (1980). Shading and temperature as environmental factors affecting growth, nodulation, and symbiotic N2-fixation by soybeans. Agronomy Journal 72:305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, K. J., Hall, A. E. & Asbell, C. W. (1980). Drought adaptation of cowpea. I. Influence of drought on seed yield. Agronomy Journal 72:413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R. M. & Brown, D. E. (1982). Sonoran desertscrub. Desert Plants 4(1–4):181–221.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping—its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32(1): 1–10.Google Scholar