Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T18:56:26.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time to the first relapse after the transcranial magnetic stimulation with H7-coil in patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia; A randomized, sham controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

K. Matić*
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
I. Š. Filipčić
Affiliation:
University Hospital Cnetre Zagreb, Zagreb
Ž. Milovac
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
T. Gajšak
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
K. Bosak
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
I. Orgulan
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
V. Požgaj
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
Ž. Bajić
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
V. Grošić
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan
I. Filipčić
Affiliation:
Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia experience severe functional impairment and limited response to pharmacological treatments. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has shown potential for treating negative symptoms, but its impact on long-term outcomes, such as time to relapse, remains underexplored.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine whether TMS with an H7-coil prolongs time to first relapse compared to sham stimulation in patients with low positive symptomatology and predominant negative symptoms.

Methods

This study was a randomized, sham-controlled trial at the Psychiatric Clinic Sveti Ivan, Zagreb, Croatia. The target population were patients with PANSS negative symptoms score > 24 and PANSS positive symptoms score < 20, on stable pharmacotherapy for at least three months The intervention group received high-frequency TMS with an H7-coil, while the control group received sham stimulation, both applied once daily for 20 sessions over four weeks. The outcome was time to first psychiatric relapse, defined as psychiatric rehospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical comparisons.

Results

A total of 76 outpatients with schizophrenia, aged 18-55 were included; 33% were women. Over the 12-month follow-up, 29% in the H7 group and 24% in the sham group experienced a relapse. The median time to relapse was not reached in either group. The hazard ratio (HR) for relapse in the H7 group relative to sham was 0.82 (95% CI 0.34; 1.97), suggesting no significant effect of TMS on delaying relapse. Adjusted Cox regression model for age, gender, baseline severity of negative and positive symptoms, pharmacotherapy, and number of prior hospitalizations showed similar results (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.30; 2.46, p = 0.769). Significant predictors of relapse were baseline severity of negative symptoms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79; 0.99, p = 0.026) and the number of prior hospitalizations (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.16; 2.82, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

No significant effect of H7-coil TMS on delaying relapse was observed in patients with schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms. Median survival was not reached in either group, suggesting the need for longer follow-up to fully evaluate potential benefits. Baseline severity of negative symptoms and prior hospitalizations should be considered when assessing relapse risk in this patient population.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.