Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-08T07:40:59.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A stress-reduction eHealth intervention for healthcare workers: a pilot implementation study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

B. García-Vázquez*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario La Paz (HULP) Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Paz (IdiPAZ) Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)
C. Bayón Pérez
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario La Paz (HULP) Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Paz (IdiPAZ) Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) Instituto de Investigación Carlos III
M. F. Bravo Ortiz
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario La Paz (HULP) Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Paz (IdiPAZ) Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) Instituto de Investigación Carlos III
R. Mediavilla Torres
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) Instituto de Investigación Carlos III Hospital Universitario La Princesa Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Public health and policy require effective health strategies for diverse contexts. Despite numerous studies, a gap exists in translating knowledge to real-world scenarios. The RESPOND study’s stepped-care intervention has shown efficacy in anxiety and depression among healthcare workers, recognized by the European Commission as a best practice. Conducting a pilot trial in Madrid, we aimed to address this research-to-practice gap.

Objectives

After evaluating a previous randomized controlled trial, we adapted our intervention for a primary care center in Madrid, implementing it over 5-6 weeks in November-December 2023. We used two strategies: remote delivery via app or website with weekly calls, and hybrid, with group sessions instead of calls.

Methods

Gathering data included sociodemographic (age, gender, and type of job), clinical (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K-10), and qualitative insights through interviews, to explore implementation outcomes from Proctor’s model (Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Fidelity, and some ideas for future large-scale implementation). We used mixed methods to analyse data. For the quantative data, we used descriptive statistics such as means, frequencies and percentages to describe the results. For qualitative data, interview transcriptions were analysed following thematic analysis guidelines.

Results

We included 17 out of 39 healthcare workers (44%) working at the primary care center, the sample included 8 doctors, 5 medical residents, 3 nurses, and 1 social worker. Only 3 were male. Over half chose the hybrid option, with 2 dropouts. Regarding clinical information, 88% of participants initially reported psychological distress, but after the intervention, this dropped to 66%. Participants found the intervention timely and appropriate, with an average satisfaction rating of 8 out of 10.

Conclusions

Preliminary findings show the intervention was well-received, and both strategies were successful, reaching a broad audience. Thematic analysis of the interviews is still ongoing. Preliminary results suggest that these strategies are appropriate /feasible for the Madrilenian healthcare system.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.