Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-pzzxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T14:17:37.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk assessment tools for sexual assault: a scoping review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

E. Doody*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford Psychiatry, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
D. Flynn
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford Psychiatry, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
S. Nolan
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Risk assessment tools are used to enhance patient safety and promote quality care by limiting adverse outcomes to the greatest extent possible. In the Republic of Ireland, risk is monitored and regulated by the Mental Health Commission (MHC). A 2023 report by the MHC identified high numbers of recorded episodes of sexual assault on the acute inpatient unit in the Department of Psychiatry (DOP), University Hospital Waterford (UHW). Standard risk assessment tools are used in the DOP, however, these risk assessment tools failed to identify those who were at high risk of perpetrating a sexual assault.

Objectives

The purpose of this research was to determine if there were risk assessment tools with a higher predictive value of identifying risk of sexual assault in an acute adult inpatient psychiatric setting. I also wanted to establish whether there were risk assessment tools available which assess risk of sexual assault in those with no history of perpetrated sexual assault.

Methods

This scoping review was prepared according to the PRISMA-Scr guidelines. Databases including Embase, Medline, CINAHL, UptoDate, TRIP, Cochrane and PsychINFO were searched. Keywords included inpatient, psychiatry, mental health, risk assessment tools, risk assessment scales, risk management, sexual assault and sexual offense. There was no limit on the date of publication or country of origin of articles. Only articles that used risk assessment tools on adults, who were inpatients in an acute psychiatric setting, in the English language were included. Only risk assessment tools that included assessment of risk of sexual assault were included.

Results

A total of 15 articles were identified. There was a dearth of literate that compared risk assessment tools in this population with regards to risk of sexual assault. Most articles exploring risk of sexual assault focused on the study of those who were offenders and explored the risk of recidivism through the use of risk assessment tools.

Conclusions

Risk cannot be accurately predicted or eliminated. However, determining the most appropriate and comprehensive risk assessment tools, with the highest probability of identifying risk of sexual assault has the potential to enhance patient safety and improve the quality of care provided. There is a lack of risk assessment tools that assess sexual assault, especially in those with no prior history of perpetrating a sexual assault.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.