Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-9954g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T14:17:38.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resources, support and integration as influencing factors in the implementation of blended therapy in psychiatric inpatient care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

W. Kawohl*
Affiliation:
Clienia Schlössli AG, Oetwil am See, Zurich Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland UNIC Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
N. Gupta
Affiliation:
Clienia Schlössli AG, Oetwil am See, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Blended therapy (BT) is defined as the use of digital tools combined with traditional face-to-face therapy. Despite growing evidence concerning BT in outpatient settings, there is not much data on BT in inpatient care. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to investigate the implementation of BT in the routine care of psychiatric inpatients.

Objectives

Our objective was to identify factors potential barriers and facilitating factors influencing the implementation of BT in psychiatric inpatient settings.

Methods

We used a retrospective, exploratory qualitative research design and developed a semi-structured interview to collect our data. This enabled us to gain insights into the experiences of healthcare staff and patients. Participants were asked to reflect on the following themes we had pre-defined: resources, support, integration and sequential BT.

Results

Therapists cited work overload with inadequate time adjustments and lack of ongoing training to sustain the use of BT in the long term as common barriers. A key finding of this study from the therapists’ perspective was also the importance of a clearly defined concept and setting for successful implementation. Patients valued the availability of satisfactory instructions for use, integration by therapists and a flexible setting. There were mixed opinions on sequential BT, with therapists mentioning in particular a lack of resources for patient care after discharge.

Conclusions

In summary, the results show that therapists reported more barriers in contrast to patients’ perceptions. This highlights that while understanding the patient’s perspective is important, healthcare professionals play the central role in implementing and maintaining BT.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.