Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-b5cpw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-11T19:59:46.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reconsidering evidence for psychedelic-induced psychosis: An overview of reviews, a systematic review, and meta-analysis of human studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

M. Sabé*
Affiliation:
Adult Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Persons with schizophrenia are currently excluded from psychedelic-assisted therapy due to concerns about psychedelic-induced acute or persistent psychotic symptoms. However, meta-analytic evidence of the precise risk for psychedelic-induced de novo and exacerbation of psychosis in people with pre-existing psychotic disorders is lacking.

Objectives

We conducted an overview of reviews, systematic review, and meta-analysis to examine the incidence of psychedelic-induced psychosis and the exacerbation of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia.

Methods

Our pre-registered protocol (CRD42023399591) covered: LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, and MDMA. Embase, PubMed, PsyARTICLES, PsyINFO, and trial registries were searched from inception until 11/2023.

Results

The incidence of psychedelic-induced psychosis was computed using a random-effects model, and standardized assessments of study quality was performed. We retained 131 publications: 14 systematic reviews, 20 reviews, 35 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), 10 case-control studies, 30 uncontrolled trials (UCT), and 22 cohort studies with overall low study quality. The meta-analysis included nine studies. Incidence of psychedelic-induced psychosis was 0.002% (95%CI 0-0.006, I2=0%, N=123,800; n=2) in population studies; 0.2% (95%CI 0.1-0.3, I2=0%, N=6,535; n=6) in UCT, and 0.6% (95%CI 0.2-1.8, I2=0%, N=563; n=3) in RCTs excluding individuals with a history of psychotic symptoms. In UCT including patients with schizophrenia, 3.8% (95%CI 1.6-8.9, I2=0%, N=133; n=2) developed long-lasting psychotic symptoms. In cohort studies, 13.1% (95%CI 9.4-17.9, I2=24%, N=353; n=3) of those with psychedelic-induced psychosis developed schizophrenia. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the main findings. The incidence for psychedelic-induced psychosis is low but slightly higher in studies including patients with schizophrenia. The risk of transition to schizophrenia after psychedelic-induced psychosis is considerable.

Conclusions

In summary, the reviewed evidence suggests that schizophrenia might not be a definite exclusion criterion for clinical trials exploring safety and efficacy of psychedelics for treatment-resistant depression and negative symptoms. However, given the low quality and limited number of studies, more high-quality research is needed, and a conservative approach is recommended until further data is available.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.