Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-rtkvj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T13:39:15.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological outcomes of patients with bipolar disorder during the perinatal period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

S. Arsova*
Affiliation:
Day Hospital Head of University Clinic of Psychiatry, University Clinic of Psychiatry
S. Mitrovska
Affiliation:
Day Hospital
M. Milutinovic
Affiliation:
Day Hospital
S. Kocoska
Affiliation:
Day Hospital
V. Isjanovski
Affiliation:
PHCI Psychiatric Hospital “Skopje”, Skopje, North Macedonia
S. Bajraktarov
Affiliation:
Day Hospital
M. Stankovic
Affiliation:
Day Hospital
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Women with bipolar disorder (BD) face a high risk of adverse mental health outcomes during the perinatal period, including a high prevalence of affective episodes and postpartum psychosis. The challenge of management BD in this period includes balancing maternal stability while securing fetal safety, given the teratogenic risks of mood-stabilizing medications.

Objectives

To evaluate the course of BD during the perinatal period, assess the impact of risk factors, and examine the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 23 patients with various sociodemographic characteristics, diagnosed with BD (ICD-10 criteria). They were monitored over the course of 6 months utilizing EPDS (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), and the Young Mania Rating Scale at baseline, 3 – months and 6-months follow up, in addition to a clinically guided interview, non-standardized sociodemographic and risk factors questionnaire. The patients were treated with a combined approach in a specialized unit for mothers, including individual and group therapy, along with pharmacological treatment. Nearly all patients were switched to atypical antipsychotics with stabilizing effects while valproate was excluded due to teratogenic risks.

Results

The cohort comprised mostly of women over 30 (69.6%, p = 0.006), married (78.3%, p = 0.000), with stable socioeconomic status (69.6%, p = 0.008). Combined treatment (inpatient and outpatient) was predominant (82.6%, p = 0.000), with antipsychotics either alone (21.7%) or in combination with other medications as the most common treatment (91.3%, p = 0.000). All participants reported risk factors, including history of affective episodes (95.6%), traumatic events, intimate-partner violence (34.8%), substance abuse (26.1%), and unplanned pregnancy (21.7%).The EPDS scores showed a low likelihood of depression at baseline, 3, and 6 months (56.5%, 69.6%, 69.6%; p < 0.05), with mean scores decreasing from baseline to three months and slightly increasing at six months (p = 0.81). The YMRS scale indicated a significant reduction in mania from baseline to six months (p = 0.038). There was no significant correlation between risk factors and postnatal depression (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The study confirms that BD women are at high risk for affective destabilization during the perinatal period. While continuous treatment mitigates severe mood deterioration, BD women remain vulnerable, necessitating long-term monitoring. One or more risk factors were registered in all of the participants. Although no direct significant correlation was observed in this study, existing literature suggests that risk factors such as unplanned pregnancy, abrupt medication changes, and intimate-partner violence are associated with adverse outcomes in BD women during the perinatal period. Understanding and managing these risks is essential for comprehensive BD care.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.