Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-b5cpw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-13T14:55:41.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological distress and unmet support needs among individuals at high hereditary cancer risk: Preliminary findings from a national needs assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

E. Lowry*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
P. D’Alton
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
L. O’Driscoll
Affiliation:
St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
K. Cahill
Affiliation:
St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
D. McCartan
Affiliation:
St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
S. Deschênes
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Individuals at high familial or genetic risk of cancer face unique psychological challenges that can lead to significant distress, including worry, fear, and uncertainty about their future health and family members’ risk. This study assessed mental health challenges, including anxiety and depression, in this population and explored their preferred forms of psychological support.

Objectives

To examine the prevalence of psychological distress in individuals at high hereditary cancer risk, the relationship between their current perceived support and distress, and preferred psychological support forms to inform the development of tailored mental health services.

Methods

Participants (N = 152; 95% female, 3% male, 2% non-binary; mean age = 42.6 ± 8.3) were cancer-free residents of the Republic of Ireland identified as high-risk for hereditary cancer through high-risk clinic attendance or self-reported genetic screening or family history. They completed a cross-sectional survey using standardised mental health assessments, including Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and self-reported adequacy of psychological support and preferences. Descriptive statistics and post-hoc tests were used to analyse psychological distress, support adequacy, and preferences.

Results

Moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7 ≥10) was reported by 23%, and moderate to severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥10) by 18%. Participants reporting inadequate support had significantly higher anxiety (M = 8.1 ± 6.2) and depression (M = 6.4 ± 5.7) scores than those with adequate support (GAD-7: M = 4.2 ± 3.9; PHQ-9: M = 3.6 ± 3.9). ANOVA indicated significant differences in anxiety (F (2,132) = 7.04, p = .001) and depression (F (2,130) = 4.68, p = .011) scores across support levels. Post-hoc Tukey tests showed poorer mental health for those without support (p < .001 for anxiety; p = .013 for depression). Mental health professionals (psychologists and counsellors) were the top preferences for support, chosen by 74.8% of participants, with 47.5% selecting a psychologist and 27.3% a counsellor. An additional 12.2% preferred a healthcare professional (e.g., General Practitioner or nurse).

Conclusions

This study provides important insights into the mental health challenges faced by individuals at high hereditary cancer risk, particularly those lacking adequate psychological support. Participants reporting inadequate support experienced significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring adequate psychological support services for this population and their strong preference for professional psychological care. Integrating this care into routine genetic counselling and oncology services could help to address the unmet mental health needs of this underserved population.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.