Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-r5dbb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T14:17:10.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A naturalistic study on physioterapy in acute psychiatric service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

A. Di Luca*
Affiliation:
Mental Health
A. Tomassini
Affiliation:
Mental Health
C. Capanna
Affiliation:
Mental Health
S. Tozzi
Affiliation:
Medical, ASL Rieti, Rieti, Italy
P. Marignetti
Affiliation:
Medical, ASL Rieti, Rieti, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

There is clear evidence on the physical and psychological benefits of a bodily approach for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. They can have a significant impact on the patient’s perceived suffering (Carek et al. IJPM 2011; 41(1) 15–28). In January 2024, a Physiotherapy Project started at the Acute Psychiatric Service of the Rieti ASL in collaboration with the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine service.

Objectives

Evaluate the impact of the physiotherapy program on psychopathological dimensions and on the patients subjective well-being.

Methods

The naturalistic study was conducted on subjects consecutively hospitalized at the SPDC from January to June 2024 who voluntarily joined the physiotherapy activity. The intervention was administered with bi-weekly sessions of about 45 minutes and included: stretching, orientation exercises, active movement, coordination, muscle strengthening. The Exclusion Criteria were: sedation status, disorganization, behavioral problems. The General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were adminstred at admission (T0) and discharge (T1). A Self-evaluation of the useful of the program was administred only to discarege (T1): participants answered by choosing between “not useful”, “partly useful”, “very useful” to 4 questions on the usefullness of the intervention.

Results

Thirty-five participants (17 M, 18 F; mean age 38.2±15,4) were admitted to physical activity. They recieved the following diagnoses: 48.6% Psychotic Disorder, 20% Depressive Disorder, 2.9% Bipolar Disorder, 28.6% Personality Disorder. Eleven of 35 participants had comorbid substance use disorder (14.3% alcohol, 5.7% cocaine, 5.7% cannabis, 2.9% opioids, 2.9% other substances). The hospitalization time was 11.8±4.3 and the average number of physical sessions was 1.7±0.8. The BPRS (44.4±11vs25.9±4.5; F=1024.25; p<0.001) and GHQ-12 (24.6±4.9vs15.11±5.8; F=833,43; p<0.001) mean scores significant improved in two time of evaluation (T0 and T1).

Conclusions

Participants showed a reduction in psychopathological severity and an increase in perceived well-being between T0 and T1. They found useful to practice physioterapy during hospitalozation and to manage anxiety, muscle relaxation and mood improvement.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.