Hostname: page-component-65b85459fc-pzhgk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-15T17:03:25.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvements in Functioning with Esketamine Nasal Spray versus Quetiapine Extended Release in Patients with Treatment Resistant Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

E. Vieta*
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
N. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Sakina Mental Health & Wellbeing Services; College of Medicine, and Health Sciences of the United Arab Emirates University, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
C. Arango
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
A. J. Cleare
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
K. Demyttenaere
Affiliation:
Universitair Psychiatrisch Centrum KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
M. Dold
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
T. Ito
Affiliation:
Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe, United Kingdom
Y. Kambarov
Affiliation:
Janssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium
S. Krüger
Affiliation:
Vivantes Humboldt Clinic, Department of Mental Health, Berlin, Germany
P. M. Llorca
Affiliation:
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
R. S. McIntyre
Affiliation:
University of Toronto Braxia Scientific, Toronto, Canada
G. Sani
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Department of Psychiatry, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
C. von Holt
Affiliation:
Janssen EMEA, Neuss, Germany
B. Rive
Affiliation:
Janssen EMEA, Paris, France
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

In the ESCAPE-TRD study, esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) significantly increased chance of remission at Week 8 versus (vs) quetiapine extended release (Q-XR) in patients (pts) with treatment resistant depression (TRD; Reif et al. NEJM 2023; 389:1298–309). Changes in disability and functional impairment due to depressive symptoms assessed with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) are reported.

Objectives

To assess the effect of ESK-NS vs Q-XR on pts’ daily functioning using SDS, considering their symptom evolution.

Methods

ESCAPE‑TRD was a randomised phase IIIb trial comparing the efficacy of ESK-NS vs Q-XR, both alongside an ongoing selective serotonin/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in pts with TRD. Clinical response (CRes) was defined as ≥50% improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline or total score ≤10, clinical remission (CRem) was defined as total MADRS score of ≤10, and functional remission (FRem) was defined as SDS total score ≤6. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time to event analyses, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression models. Time in each state was estimated by treatment arm and compared between arms using analysis of covariance.

Results

336 and 340 pts were randomised to ESK-NS and Q-XR, respectively. Significantly more ESK-NS treated pts achieved CRes, CRem and FRem (HRs: 1.848, 1.711 and 1.819, respectively; all p<0.001), and achieved these faster, compared to Q-XR (Figure 1). In each arm and at each time point, more pts reached CRes than CRem, and more reached CRem than FRem, illustrating that FRem is more difficult to achieve (Figure 1). Total time in CRes was 5.4 weeks greater for ESK-NS compared with Q-XR; total time in CRem was 3.7 weeks greater and in FRem 2.0 weeks greater for ESK-NS vs Q-XR, respectively (Table 1).

Image 1:

Image 2:

Conclusions

These data support a temporal cascade of events from CRes to CRem to FRem; ESK-NS improved time to, and in, each outcome vs Q-XR. Treatments that reduce clinical symptoms better and faster provide the best chance of improving functional impairment.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.