Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T11:48:44.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender-Specific Manifestations and Diagnostic Challenges of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Women: A Focused Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

B. Mihaela*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Medical Psychology, and Psychotherapy, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova, Chişinǎu
N. Anatol
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Medical Psychology, and Psychotherapy, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova, Chişinǎu
J. Dorin
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Medical Psychology, and Psychotherapy, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova, Chişinǎu
V. Oprea
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Medical Psychology, and Psychotherapy, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova, Chişinau, Moldova, Republic of
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is often underdiagnosed in women due to gender-specific manifestations and the use of diagnostic criteria primarily based on male presentations. This underdiagnosis can lead to delayed or inadequate support and interventions for women with ASD. There is a growing recognition of the need for gender-sensitive diagnostic approaches to better identify and support women on the spectrum.

Objectives

This study aims to explore the unique manifestations of ASD in women, identify key diagnostic challenges, and propose recommendations for refining diagnostic criteria to improve accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis in female populations.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data from standardized ASD diagnostic tools (e.g., ADOS-2, ADI-R) and qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 50 women diagnosed with ASD. Participants were recruited from clinical settings and ASD support groups. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify gender-specific behavioral patterns and diagnostic challenges, while statistical analysis compared symptom presentation between male and female groups.

Results

Women with ASD exhibited distinct behavioral patterns, such as enhanced social masking abilities, higher levels of camouflaging, and differences in special interests compared to men. Table 1 highlights the frequency of common ASD symptoms in women vs. men, demonstrating significant differences in social communication (p < 0.05) and repetitive behaviors (p < 0.01). Table 2 illustrates the discrepancy in diagnostic ages between genders, with women receiving a diagnosis on average 5 years later than men. Table 3 outlines the diagnostic tools used and their respective sensitivity rates for female ASD presentation. Figure 1 visually represents the comparative analysis of symptom profiles by gender, showing a higher prevalence of internalizing symptoms in women.

Conclusions

The study confirms that ASD in women often presents differently, leading to significant diagnostic delays and underdiagnosis. Gender-specific manifestations, such as social masking and camouflaging, challenge the current diagnostic criteria, which are largely based on male-centric data. To improve the diagnosis and care of women with ASD, it is crucial to adapt existing diagnostic tools to account for these gender differences and develop new guidelines that reflect a broader spectrum of presentations.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.