Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-mz6gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T10:33:29.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring genetic sources of a decreased cognitive performance in psychometric schizotypy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

V. Plakunova
Affiliation:
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Mental Health Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
M. Alfimova
Affiliation:
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Mental Health Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
V. Golimbet*
Affiliation:
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Mental Health Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Schizotypy is seen as subclinical part of the psychosis liability continuum. While several studies have attempted to confirm the relationship between schizotypal traits and genetic predisposition to schizophrenia using polygenic risk scores (SZ-PRS), the association of SZ-PRS with other features of schizotypal individuals resembling schizophrenia symptoms remains unexplored.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the contribution of SZ-PRS and PRS for other relevant traits to cognitive functioning in schizotypy.

Methods

Healthy subjects (n=1468) were divided into low, negative, positive, and high mixed schizotypy groups based on a cluster analysis of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire data. Of them, 247 individuals had genome-wide information and completed a comprehensive cognitive battery, from which a cognitive index (CogI) was derived. PRS for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, educational attainment, intelligence (IQ), neuroticism, and risk-taking were calculated with LDpred2-auto tool. The association of the CogI with PRSs was examined with stepwise multiple linear regression controlling for age and two ancestry-related principal components.

Results

The groups differed in the CogI (p=0.015). The high schizotypy individuals (n=49) had a lower CogI than the low (n=73, p=0.01), negative (n=54, p=0.08), and positive (n=64, p=0.09) ones. SZ-PRS (β=-0.16, p=0.012) and IQ-PRS (β=0.13, p=0.014) predicted CogI in low schizotypy; IQ-PRS (β=0.42, p<0.001) in negative schizotypy; risk-taking PRS (β=-0.27, p<0.001) in positive schizotypy; and none of the PRSs predicted cognition in high schizotypy.

Conclusions

We did not find traits whose PRS might explain the lower cognitive performance in high schizotypy. Thus, nongenetic factors deserve more attention in future research.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.