Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T19:43:12.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing Autonomy and Supervision During Psychiatry Residency: A Residents’ Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

J. P. Carrasco*
Affiliation:
Hospital Provincial Castellón, Castellón
C. Conde-Pumpido
Affiliation:
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
J. Esteve
Affiliation:
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
B. Herraiz
Affiliation:
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
J.-I. Etxeandia-Pradera
Affiliation:
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
E. Aguilar
Affiliation:
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The progressive acquisition of autonomy, balanced with adequate supervision, is essential during psychiatry residency. However, the adequacy of supervision and the smooth transition to autonomy remains a concern among residents. This study evaluates psychiatry residents’ perceptions of the current process of acquiring autonomy from the first to fourth year of training.

Objectives

To assess the perceptions of psychiatry residents in Spain regarding the process of progressively acquiring autonomy and how supervision is managed throughout their residency.

Methods

A qualitative analysis was conducted on responses to the survey question: “What should be improved in the progressive acquisition of autonomy and supervision from R1 to R4?” Data from free-text responses were coded thematically, with common themes identified and quantified.

Results

Responses from 109 residents were analyzed. Thematic analysis revealed that 35% of residents emphasized the need for clearer and more structured feedback from supervisors, while 30% suggested more direct supervision during critical learning periods, particularly in the first two years. Additionally, 20% highlighted the inconsistency of supervision across different units, with some units providing much less oversight than others. Other suggestions included better scheduling of supervisory sessions (10%) and more frequent formal evaluations of their autonomy progression (5%).

ThemePercentage (%)
Structured feedback35
Increased direct supervision30
Consistency across units20
Better supervisory scheduling10
Formal evaluations of autonomy5

Conclusions

Residents identified several key areas for improvement in the process of acquiring autonomy, with a particular focus on the need for more structured feedback and increased supervision during the early years of training. Addressing these concerns may improve the overall quality of psychiatric education and resident preparedness.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.