Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T06:55:21.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

End-of-life decision-making in the ICU: perspectives on who “should” decide and influencing factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

S. Georgakis ,
E. Dragioti ,
G. Papathanakos ,
M. Gouva  and
V. Koulouras
S. Georgakis*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory of Patient, Family & Health Professional Psychology, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, University of Ioannina
E. Dragioti
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory of Patient, Family & Health Professional Psychology, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
G. Papathanakos
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, University of Ioannina Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
M. Gouva
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory of Patient, Family & Health Professional Psychology, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
V. Koulouras
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, University of Ioannina Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Discrepancies often arise between experts and non-experts regarding their roles in making end-of-life (EOL) decisions within the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Such decisions are frequently contentious in clinical settings, with wide-ranging consequences in legal, ethical, psychological, social, and clinical contexts.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to systematically review the global perspectives of physicians, nurses, family members, and the general public on who “should” be involved in decision-making for adult ICU patients, as well as to identify potential influencing factors.

Methods

Adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. A data extraction table was developed, validated through discussion and implemented by two independent researchers. The extracted data were subsequently analyzed descriptively.

Results

Thirty-three studies were included, documenting variations in findings across different geographical and temporal contexts. Most participants in these studies were healthcare professionals. Despite evidence of paternalistic tendencies, physicians generally showed a growing inclination toward a more collaborative decision-making model. Similarly, the views of other population groups leaned towards patient and family involvement, with nurses additionally supporting their own participation. Six categories of influencing factors were identified, with legal/regulatory considerations and participant demographics emerging as the most significant.

Conclusions

The overall representation of participants’ perceptions highlights a broader tendency towards collaborative decision-making. Τhis requires coordinated efforts from both clinical practitioners and policymakers to establish a decision-making framework that is inclusive, context-sensitive, and adaptable to the legal and cultural specifics of each region. To this end, emphasis should be placed on national-level interventions that address these issues directly, as opposed to broader, supranational approaches that may lack the necessary nuance.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 68 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 33rd European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2025 , pp. S759 - S760
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.