Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T07:11:55.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of Electrostimulation in Treating Major Depressive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Literature Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

J. R. Pinto Nasr*
Affiliation:
Universidade Paulista - Campus Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
F. H. de Oliveira Bezerra
Affiliation:
Universidade Paulista - Campus Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
V. A. Masson
Affiliation:
Universidade Paulista - Campus Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
L. R. Ambrósio Filgueiras
Affiliation:
Universidade Paulista - Campus Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) are prevalent conditions that significantly affect quality of life. Many patients with MDD and GAD do not respond adequately to conventional therapies, such as psychotherapy and antidepressants, highlighting the need for alternative treatments. In this context, electrostimulation, particularly Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), has shown promise by modulating brain activity to relieve symptoms.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in treating MDD and GAD.

Methods

This systematic literature review was conducted in SciELO, PubMed, covering the period from 2014 to 2024. After an initial selection of 15 articles, six studies were chosen based on relevance and reliability. The analysis focused on outcomes from controlled and randomized studies as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses, involving TMS and tDCS.

Results

The reviewed studies demonstrated that TMS and tDCS significantly reduce symptoms in MDD and GAD compared to placebo. One study evaluated the combined effect of tDCS with antidepressants, indicating a more pronounced clinical response and suggesting potential synergy between neuromodulation and pharmacotherapy in cortico-limbic circuits. However, larger sample sizes are needed to achieve robust statistical validation, clarifying the isolated impact of each modality and their combination.

Conclusions

Both TMS and tDCS represent effective therapeutic alternatives for patients with MDD and GAD, especially those refractory to conventional approaches. Although promising, implementing these techniques faces challenges, including high costs, the need for specialized professionals, and stronger scientific validation to enable widespread use. Expanding clinical knowledge and disseminating evidence-based guidelines can promote safe access to and usage of these therapies.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.