Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T08:26:05.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Psychotherapy vs Antidepressants for Depression in Primary Care in India: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

J. R Pozuelo*
Affiliation:
Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, United States
A. Lahiri
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
R. Singh
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
S. D. Hollon
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville
N. Dongare
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
A. Khan
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
A. Shukla
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
M. Ghosh
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
A. Kushwah
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
A. Bhan
Affiliation:
Sangath, Bhopal, India
Y. Parashar
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Boston, United States
V. Patel
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Boston, United States
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Depression is commonly treated with psychotherapy or antidepressants, but predicting which intervention will work best for a given patient remains a challenge. This pilot trial compared the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of psychotherapy based on behavioral activation (Healthy Activity Program, HAP) and antidepressant medication (fluoxetine) in a primary care setting in India.

Objectives

The trial had three key objectives: (1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized pilot trial comparing HAP and fluoxetine; (2) collect outcome data to refine study instruments and the baseline assessment; and (3) evaluate the preliminary comparative effectiveness of psychotherapy versus medication.

Methods

The pilot trial was conducted at eight primary health care centres in Madhya Pradesh (India) from August 2023 to February 2024. Eligible participants (aged 18+, PHQ-9 score ≥10) with moderate to severe depression were randomized to receive either HAP or fluoxetine. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, and adherence to study procedures. Acceptability was measured by adherence to interventions. Preliminary efficacy, as a secondary outcome, was assessed through changes in depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) from baseline to the 3-month follow-up.

Results

76 participants were randomized, with primary endpoint data available for 63 (83%). Retention rates and study assessment completion were acceptable across both arms. Intervention adherence was high, with 79% (30/38 in HAP and ADM groups) completing the treatment per protocol (≥6 HAP sessions or 70% medication adherence). PHQ-9 scores improved significantly, with an average reduction from 15.02 at baseline to 6.73 at the 3-month follow-up, with no statistically significant differences between treatments. Full remission (PHQ-9 < 5) was achieved by 45.16% (28/62) of participants. Additionally, the pilot study identified logistical challenges and facilitators that will help refine the protocol for the larger trial.

Conclusions

This pilot trial successfully demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the study design, procedures, and interventions. The preliminary data suggest that both HAP and Fluoxetine are viable treatments for moderate to severe depression in primary care settings in India. The findings will be instrumental in informing the design and implementation of a larger precision trial.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.