Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-54gsr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T05:41:39.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acute outpatient ECT for depression: case series of the first clinical pilot in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

S. Inam*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry
M. Qari
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry
H. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry
T. McMonagle
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry
J. Lorey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry
M. McGarry
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
V. McMullan
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
M. Finnegan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

ECT is a well-evidenced, cost-effective intervention for treatment-resistant depression. In Ireland acute (twice-weekly) outpatient ECT for depression has not been reported, though common elsewhere. Ireland has among the lowest number of inpatient psychiatry beds per person in Europe. We observed a clinical need for acute outpatient ECT for people who could not access elective inpatient care.

Objectives

We describe the process, interventions, outcomes and stakeholder feedback for four cases of acute outpatient ECT.

Methods

All cases provided written informed consent. A multidisciplinary (psychiatry, anaesthesiology, nursing) protocol for assessment and delivery of acute outpatient ECT was developed and implemented, cases described and feedback from stakeholders sought in an acceptability forum.

Results

Four medically stable patients (ASA Grades 2-3) completed acute outpatient ECT (Table 1), receiving between n=6 and n=12 ECT treatments, attending from home. N=140 inpatient psychiatry bed days were saved, and n=45 community psychiatry reviews were required. No adverse events or medical interventions occurres. Three people had CGI outcome of “very much improved” and one person halted their treatment course when “minimally improved”, citing lack of response. Stakeholder feedback in an acceptability forum highlighted the increased resource intensity of twice-weekly community review for outpatient ECT, and the positive outcomes for treatment-resistant depression.

Conclusions

Acute outpatient ECT was safe and effective in this case series and resulted in n=140 psychiatry inpatient bed days being saved. There was an increased need for reviews from the community team during the treatment protocol. Medically stable patients with substantial social support were eligible for this pilot phase, thus a priority for future development must be equity of access to this effective intervention.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.