Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T19:12:13.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Weil-Felix Reaction in Tsutsugamushi Disease1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. W. Wolff
J. W. Wolff
Affiliation:
(From the Pathological Laboratory, Medan-Sumatra.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The Weil-Felix reaction in a series of forty-five cases of tsutsugamushi disease (type Schüffner) is recorded.

2. The agglutination reaction was negative in fifteen cases, the other thirty showing a positive reaction with the “Kingsbury” strain of B. proteus X.

3. The Weil-Felix reaction is not regarded as an adequate method for differentiating tsutsugamushi disease from scrub typhus, since high titres (1 in 1000) occur in a considerable proportion of cases of tsutsugamushi disease.

4. In the present state of our knowledge of the two diseases it is recommended that they should be separated according to the presence or absence of a primary ulcer and bubo.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , July 1931 , pp. 352 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

References

REFERENCES

Anigstein, L. (1930). Malayan Med. J. 5, 62.Google Scholar
Bien, L. and Sonntag, F. (1917). Münch, Med. W. 64, 1409.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1930). System of Bacteriology, Med. Res. Council, 7, 412.Google Scholar
Felix, A. and Olitzki, L. (1929). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 10, 26.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W. (1930). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 23, 37.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W. and Lesslar, J. E. (1925). Bull. Inst. Med. Res. Fed. Malay States, No. 2.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W., Lesslar, J. E. and Lewthwaite, R. (1929). Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg. 23, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiwara, K. and Ogata, N. (1923). Centr. f. Bakt. Orig. i, 90, 164.Google Scholar
Kawamura, N. (1926). Bull. Coll. Med. Univ. Cincinnati. Monograph.Google Scholar
Kawamura, N. (1930). Kolle-Wassermann, 3rd ed. 8, 1387.Google Scholar
Maasland, J. H. (1926). Thesis, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Prausnitz, K. (1920). Centr. f. Bakt. Orig. i, 84, 103.Google Scholar
Schüffner, W. (1909). Geneesk. Tijdschr. v. Ned. Indië, 49, lxiv.Google Scholar
Schüffner, W. and Wachsmuth, M. (1909). Zeitschr. f. klin. Med. 71, Heft 1–2.Google Scholar
Weil, E. and Felix, A. (1917). Wien. klin. Wochenschr. 30, 1509.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. W. (1929). Geneesk. Tijdschr. v. Ned. Indië, 69, 429.Google Scholar