Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T00:24:07.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation Organizations and Wilderness Use—a Time for Policy Appraisal?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Alan Jubenville
Alan Jubenville
Affiliation:
Department of Recreation and Park Administration, Box 3402, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Conservation organizations have been primary forces in the establishment of wilderness areas throughout the United States. They have also been actual participants in wilderness recreation, particularly through sponsored trips. Preliminary results indicate that these trips have a tremendous impact on the wilderness resource because of the large-size parties, sedentary camping habits, and the large amount of bulky tentage and equipment employed. Basic policy changes are suggested as a means of protecting the wilderness landscape.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Summer 1974 , pp. 93 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beltrán, E. (1964). Use and conservation: two conflicting principles. Pp. 35–43 in First World Conference On National Parks (Ed. Adams, A. B.). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: xxxiii + 471 pp.Google Scholar
Dotzenko, A. D., Papamichos, N.T. & Romine, D. S. (1967). Effect of recreational use on soil and moisture conditions in Rocky Mountain National Park. Jour. Soil and Water Cons., 22, pp. 196–7.Google Scholar
Frissell, S. S. Jr, & Duncan, D. P. (1965). Campsite preference and deterioration. Jour. For., 63(4), pp. 256–60.Google Scholar
Jubenville, A. (1970). Travel Patterns of Wilderness Users in the Anaconda-Pintlar Wilderness. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula: 238 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Jubenville, A. (1973). Direct Observation as a Research Technique in Studying Wilderness Visitor Behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wyoming, Laramie: 20 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1925). The last stand of wilderness. Am. For. and For. Life, 31, pp. 599–604.Google Scholar
Lime, D. W. (1972). Large groups in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area—their numbers, characteristics, and impact. U.S. Forest Service Research Note NC-142, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. C. (1968). Research needs for national parks. Pp. 904–30 in The Canadian National Parks: Today and Tomorrow (Ed. Nelson, J. G. & Scace, R. C.). Studies in Land Use History and Landscape Change, National Parks Series No. 3, Vol. 2 (of pp. [iv +] 603–1027).Google Scholar
Lucas, R. C. (1971). Natural amenities, outdoor recreation, and wilderness. Pp. 131–50 in Ecology-Economics Environment (Ed. Behan, R. W. & Weddle, R. M.). Montana For. and Cons. Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula: ix + 198 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Merriam, L. C Jr, & Ammons, R. B. (1967). The Wilderness User in Three Montana Wilderness Areas. University of Minnesota Misc. Monographe [unnumbered], 28 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and the American Mind. Yale University Press, New Haven & London: xiii + 256 pp.Google Scholar
Snyder, A. P. (1966). Wilderness management—a growing challenge. Journ. For., 64(7), pp. 441–6.Google Scholar
Thornburg, D. A. (1962). An Ecological Study of the Effects of Man's Recreational Use at Two Subalpine Sites in Western Washington. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley: 179 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
U.S. Forest Service (1970). Proposed draft material for regional multiple-use management guide. Beyond Roads End: Wilderness (Workshop Manual, Region 1, U.S. Forest Service), Section 8, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Wildland Research Center (1962). Wilderness and recreation—a report on resources, values, and problems. O.R.R.R.C. Study Report No. 3, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: 352 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Willard, B. E. & Marr, J. W. (1970). Effects of human activities on alpine tundra ecosystems in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Biological Conservation, 2(4), pp. 257–65, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar