Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T07:26:53.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendered access to cooking energy solutions under multi-tier frameworks and its welfare effects in Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2025

Sydney Kabango Chishimba Open the ORCID record for Sydney Kabango Chishimba [Opens in a new window]  and
Edwin Muchapondwa Open the ORCID record for Edwin Muchapondwa [Opens in a new window]
Sydney Kabango Chishimba*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Edwin Muchapondwa
Affiliation:
School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
*
Corresponding author: Sydney Kabango Chishimba; Email: chssyd001@myuct.ac.za
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Having a modern cooking stove at the household level provides an incomplete measure of cooking energy access. This limitation has necessitated the introduction of a multi-tier framework (MTF) to provide a more nuanced assessment. Thus, this study examines the overall, gendered, and rural-urban effects of cooking energy access under the MTF on health and time allocation to various household activities. Using the 2018 World Bank/ESMAP MTF dataset on Zambia, the study applies inverse probability regression adjustment with generalized propensity score to estimate pairwise average treatment effect on treated, by categorising households to tiers (0–5) based on six primary cooking energy attributes. The findings reveal that as households move up the MTF tiers, improvements in outcomes – such as reduced respiratory illness and better time allocation – are generally observed, though the magnitude of benefits tends to taper at higher tiers. Furthermore, women experience greater improvements relative to men, particularly in lower-tier transitions.

Keywords

gender multi-tier frameworkhousehold cooking energywelfare indicators

JEL classification

O13: Agriculture • Natural Resources • Energy • Environment • Other Primary Products D13: Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation I30: General Q40: General

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , First View , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adrianzén, MA (2013) Improved cooking stoves and firewood consumption: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Northern Peruvian Andes. Ecological Economics 89, 135–143.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, SN and Chowdhury, SJ (2010) Improved earthen stoves in coastal areas in Bangladesh: Economic, ecological, and socio-cultural evaluation. Biomass and Bioenergy 34, 1954–1960.10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderman, TL, DeFries, RS, Wood, SA, Remans, R, Ahuja, R and Ulla, SE (2015) Biogas cook stoves for healthy and sustainable diets? A case study in southern India. Frontiers in Nutrition 2, article 28.10.3389/fnut.2015.00028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensch, G, Grimm, M and Peters, J (2015) Why do households forego high returns from technology adoption? Evidence from improved cooking stoves in Burkina Faso. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organisation 116, 187–205.10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensch, G and Peters, J (2015) The intensive margin of technology adoption – Experimental evidence on improved cooking stoves in rural Senegal. Journal of Health Economics 42, 44–63.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.03.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatia, M and Angelou, N (2015) Beyond connections: Energy access redefined. ESMAP Technical Report 008/15. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.Google Scholar
Bonan, J, Pareglio, S and Tavoni, M (2017) Access to modern energy: A review of barriers, drivers, and effects. Environment and Development Economics 22, 491–516.10.1017/S1355770X17000201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, N, Bhojvaid, V, Jeuland, MA, Lewis, JJ, Patange, O and Pattanayak, SK (2016) How much do alternative cooking stoves reduce biomass fuel use? Evidence from North India. Resource and Energy Economics 43, 153–171.10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, M and Kopeinig, S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys 22, 31–72.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, MD, Drukker, DM and Holland, AD (2013) Estimation of multivalued treatment effects under conditional Independence. The Stata Journal 13, 407–450.10.1177/1536867X1301300301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choumert-Nkolo, J, Motel, PC and Le Roux, L (2019) Stacking up the ladder: A panel data analysis of Tanzanian household energy choices. World Development 115, 222–235.10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundale, K, Thomas, R, Malava, J, Havens, D, Mortimer, K and Conteh, L (2017) A health intervention or a kitchen appliance? Household costs and benefits of a cleaner burning biomass fuelled cookstove in Malawi. Social Science & Medicine 183, 1–10.10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damte, A, Koch, SF and Mekonnen, A (2012) Coping with fuelwood scarcity: Household responses in rural Ethiopia. Discussion Paper Series, EfD DP 12-01, Environment for Development Initiative.Google Scholar
Darlami, H (2021) Performance evaluation of two pot raised mud improved cookstove. Journal of Innovations in Engineering Education 4, 50–54.10.3126/jiee.v4i1.34821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duflo, E, Greenstone, M and Hanna, R (2008) Indoor air pollution, health and economic well-being. S.A.P.I.EN.S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society 1.Google Scholar
Foell, W, Pachauri, S, Spreng, D and Zerriffi, H (2011) Household cooking fuels and technologies in developing economies. Energy Policy 39, 7487–7496.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groh, S, Pachauri, S and Rao, ND (2016) What are we measuring? An empirical analysis of household electricity access metrics in rural Bangladesh. Energy for Sustainable Development 30, 21–31.10.1016/j.esd.2015.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, K and Imbens, GW (2004) The propensity score with continuous treatments. In Gelman, A and Meng, X-L (eds). Applied Bayesian Modelling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 73–84.10.1002/0470090456.ch7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, K, Imbens, GW, Rubin, DB and Zhou, X (2000) Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. Biostatistics 1, 69–88.10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hnyine, ZT, Sagala, S, Lubis, W and Yamin, D (2015) Analysing the economic benefits of rural biogas adoption in Selo Sub-District, Boyolali, Indonesia. Working Paper Series No. 8, Resilience Development Initiative.Google Scholar
Hooper, LG, Dièye, Y, Ndiaye, A, Diallo, A, Sack, CS, Fan, VS, Neuzil, KM and Ortiz, JR (2018) Traditional cooking practices and preferences for stove features among women in rural Senegal: Informing improved cookstove design and interventions. Plos One 13, e0206822.10.1371/journal.pone.0206822CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imbens, GW (2000) The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika 87, 706–710.10.1093/biomet/87.3.706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency and World Bank (2014) Sustainable Energy for All 2013-2014: Global Tracking Framework Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/978-1-4648-0200-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagoe, K, Rossanese, M, Charron, D, Rouse, J, Waweru, F, Waruguru, M, Delapena, S and Piedrahita, R (2020) Sharing the burden: Shifts in family time use, agency and gender dynamics after introduction of new cookstoves in rural Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science 64, 101413.10.1016/j.erss.2019.101413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, JK (2014) Effect of adoption of biogas plant on socio-economic status of the biogas users in Ujjain District of Madhya Pradesh. Unpublished master's thesis. Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior College of Agriculture, Gwalior, India.Google Scholar
Jeuland, MA and Pattanayak, SK (2012) Benefits and costs of improved cookstoves: Assessing the implications of variability in health, forest and climate impacts. PloS One 7, e30338.10.1371/journal.pone.0030338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeuland, MA, Pattanayak, SK, Samaddar, S, Shah, R and Vora, M (2020) Adoption and effects of improved biomass cookstoves in rural Rajasthan. Energy for Sustainable Development 57, 149–159.10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khandker, SR, Barnes, DF and Samad, HA (2009) Welfare impacts of rural electrification: A case study from Bangladesh. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (4859).Google Scholar
Krishnapriya, PP, Chandrasekaran, M, Jeuland, M and Pattanayak, SK (2021) Do improved cookstoves save time and improve gender outcomes? Evidence from six developing countries. Energy Economics 102, 105456.10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, WL, Aydin, B and Gurel, S (2019) A comparison of propensity score weighting methods for evaluating the effects of programs with multiple versions. The Journal of Experimental Education 87, 75–88.10.1080/00220973.2017.1409179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, JJ, Hollingsworth, JW, Chartier, RT, Cooper, EM, Foster, WM, Gomes, GL, Kussin, PS, MacInnis, JJ, Padhi, BK, Panigrahi, P and Rodes, CE (2017) Biogas stoves reduce firewood use, household air pollution, and hospital visits in Odisha, India. Environmental Science and Technology 51, 560–569.10.1021/acs.est.6b02466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundberg, S and Pollak, RA (1994) Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage. The American Economic Review 84, 132–137.Google Scholar
Luzi, L, Lin, Y, Koo, BB, Rysankova, D and Portale, E (2019) Zambia–Beyond Connections: Energy Access Diagnostic Report Based on the Multi-Tier Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/32750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masatsugu, L (2017) Household cooking technologies and REDD+: Pilot experiences in Tanzania and across the tropics. Master's thesis. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University.Google Scholar
McCaffrey, DF, Griffin, BA, Almirall, D, Slaughter, ME, Ramchand, R and Burgette, LF (2013) A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalised boosted models. Statistics in Medicine 32, 3388–3414.10.1002/sim.5753CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G and Mobarak, AM (2014) Gender differences in preferences, intra-household externalities, and low demand for improved cookstoves. NBER Working Paper Series, No. w18964. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Mobarak, A, Dwivedi, P, Bailis, R, Hildemann, L and Miller, G (2012) Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 10815–10820.10.1073/pnas.1115571109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrissey, J (2017) The Energy Challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Guide for Advocates and Policy Makers. Part 2: Addressing Energy Poverty. Oxfam Research Backgrounder Series.Google Scholar
Pillarisetti, A, Vaswani, M, Jack, D, Balakrishnan, K, Bates, MN, Arora, NK and Smith, KR (2014) Patterns of stove usage after introduction of an advanced cookstove: The long-term application of household sensors. Environmental Science and Technology 48, 14525–14533.10.1021/es504624cCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prah, RKD, Carrión, D, Oppong, FB, Tawiah, T, Mujtaba, MN, Gyaase, S, Kwarteng, A, Ae-Ngibise, KA, Agyei, O, Twumasi, M, AGbokey, F, Asante, KP and Jack, DW (2020) Time use implication of clean cookstoves in rural settings in Ghana: A time use study. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 18, 166.10.3390/ijerph18010166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, KR, McCracken, JP, Weber, MW, Hubbard, A, Jenny, A, Thompson, LM, Balmes, J, Diaz, A, Arana, B and Bruce, N (2011) Effect of reduction in household air pollution on childhood pneumonia in Guatemala (RESPIRE): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 378, 1717–1726.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60921-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Bank (2018) World development indicator database. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.Google Scholar
World Bank/ESMAP (2018) Zambia - Multi-Tier Framework Survey for Measuring Energy Access (MTF) 2017-2018, Ref. ZMB_2017_MTF_v02_M. Available at https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/3527/get-microdata.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chishimba and Muchapondwa supplementary material

Chishimba and Muchapondwa supplementary material
Download Chishimba and Muchapondwa supplementary material(File)
File 739.7 KB