Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T14:31:23.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deriving optimal taxes for gasoline, diesel and ethanol for Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2025

Jon Strand*
Affiliation:
Climate Finance Group, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

We derive optimal road fuel taxes for gasoline, diesel and ethanol for Brazil. Fuel-related externalities, including carbon emissions and air pollution, and distance-related externalities, such as accidents, congestion and road damages, are added as Brazil has today no other way to effectively tax these components. A value-added tax (VAT) of 26.5 per cent is added to the tax for gasoline and ethanol, but not for diesel which is mostly an input and not final consumption. On this basis, we find that the optimal gasoline, diesel and ethanol taxes are US$1.03, 0.85 and 0.58 per litre, of which the respective carbon taxes, excluding VAT, are about US$0.14, 0.16 and 0.04 per litre given a carbon price of US$60 per ton of CO2. The largest externality component for gasoline and ethanol is accidents followed by congestion and carbon emissions. For diesel, air pollution is most significant, followed by accidents and congestion.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, ML and Auffhammer, M (2014) Pounds that kill: The external costs of vehicle weight. Review of Economic Studies 81, 535571.10.1093/restud/rdt035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, S, Liu, AA, Parry, IWH, and Vernon, N (2023a) IMF fossil fuel subsidies data: 2023 update. IMF Working Paper, WP/23/169. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9798400249006.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, S, Parry, IWH, Mylonas, V, Vernon, N, and Zhunussova, K (2023b) The IMF-World Bank carbon pricing assessment tool: A model to help countries mitigate climate change. IMF Working Paper, WP/23/128. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazilian Ministry of Health (2019) Saude Brasil 2018: Uma Analise da Situacao de Saude e Das Doencas e Agravos Cronicos: Desafios e Perspectivas. Brasilia: Brazilian Ministry of Health (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
De Palma, A, Kilani, M and Lindsay, M (2008) The merits of separating cars and trucks. Journal of Urban Economics 64, 340361.10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment and Energy Study Institute. (2018) Ethanol and Air Quality – Separating Fact from Fiction. EESI Policy Brief. 18 October 2018.Google Scholar
Essen, HV, Wijngaarden, LV, Schroten, A, Sutter, D, Bieler, C, Maffii, S, Brambilla, M, Fiorello, D, Fermi, F, Parolin, R and El Beyrouty, K (2019) Handbook on the External Costs of Transport – Version 2019. Report for the European Union. Delft: CE DelftGoogle Scholar
Federação Nacional do Comércio de Combustiveis e de Lubrificantes (2025) Tributação dos Combustíveis por Estado. Available at https://www.fecombustiveis.org.br/tributacao.Google Scholar
FGV Cidades (2022) Analysis of shared streets. Task C: Analysis of road space distribution and negative externalities generated by mode in São Paulo City. Report, Centro de Inovação em Politicas Publicas. FGV Cidades.Google Scholar
High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices (2017) Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Leirião, LFL (2023a) Economic evaluation of health impacts from road emissions in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo. Consultant Report for the World Bank. June 2023.Google Scholar
Leirião, LFL (2023b) Overview of NOx emissions and concentrations in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo. Consultant Report for the World Bank. June 2023.Google Scholar
Maerivoet, S and De Moor, B (2008) Traffic flow theory. ArXiv Physics 0507126.Google Scholar
Navia D, FC and Rios, H (2024) Providing Better Price Signals Through Fuel Taxation: Opportunities in Brazil's Consumption Tax Reform, . Washington, DC: Macroeconomics, Trade and Investment, the World Bank.Google Scholar
Newbery, D (1988) Road damage externalities and road user charges. Econometrica 56, 295316.10.2307/1911073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, IWH, Black, S and Vernon, N (2021) Still not getting prices right: A global and country update of fossil fuel subsidies. IMF Working Paper, WP/21/236. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781513595405.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, IWH, Heine, D, Li, S and Lis, E (2014) Getting the Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Parry, IWH and Small, K (2005) Does Britain or the United States have the correct fuel tax? American Economic Review 95, 12761289.10.1257/0002828054825510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, IWH, and Strand, J (2012a) International fuel tax assessment: An application to Chile. Environment and Development Economics 17(2), 127144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, IWH, and Strand, J (2012b) International fuel tax assessment: An application to chile: Appendix. Environment and Development Economics 17(2), Published online. 10.1017/S1355770X11000404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, IWH, Walls, M, and Harrington, W (2007) Automobile Externalities and Policies. Journal of Economic Literature 45(2), 373399.10.1257/jel.45.2.373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennert, K, Errickson, F, Prest, BC, Rennels, L, Newell, RG, Pizer, W, Kingdon, C, Wingenroth, J, Cooke, R, Parthum, B and Smith, D (2022) Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature 610, 687692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sant'Anna, M (2021) How green is sugarcane ethanol? Working paper, Brazil School of Economics and Finance.Google Scholar
Small, KA and van Dender, K (2007) Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect. The Energy Journal 28, 2552.10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No1-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, KA and Verhoef, ET (2007) The Economics of Urban Transportation. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203642306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, KA, Winston, C and Evans, CA (1989) Road Work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Souza Ferreira Filho, JB (2014) Ethanol expansion and indirect land use changes in Brazil. Land Use Policy 36, 595604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Agriculture (2023) Biofuels annual: Brazil. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, report number BR2023-0018. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Valdes, C (2011) Can Brazil meet the world’s growing need for ethanol? USDA Research Service. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2011/december/can-brazil-meet-the-world-s-growing-need-for-ethanol.Google Scholar
Vianna, GSB and Young, CEF (2015) Em busca do tempo perdido: Uma estimativa do produto perdido em transito no Brasil. (In search of lost time: An estimate of the production losses in traffic congestion in Brazil). In Portuguese. Revista de Economia Contemporanea 19, 403416. 10.1590/198055271933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2022) Brazil: Public Expenditure Review on Greening Fiscal Policy. ID: P179495. Brazil Country Management Unit, the World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2023) Brazil Country Climate and Development Report, 2023. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Strand supplementary material

Strand supplementary material
Download Strand supplementary material(File)
File 260 KB