Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T15:34:59.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social Epistemology of Experimental Economics, Ana Cordeiro dos Santos. Routledge 2010. xi + 210 pages.

Review products

The Social Epistemology of Experimental Economics, Ana Cordeiro dos Santos. Routledge 2010. xi + 210 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2011

Martin Jones
Martin Jones*
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Book Review
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 64 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Binmore, K. 1999. Why experiment in economics? The Economic Journal 109: F16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. K. 2008. On the autonomy of experiments in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 15: 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. R. 1995. Rational individual behaviour in markets and social choice processes: the discovered preference hypothesis. In The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour, ed. Arrow, K. J., Columbatto, E., Perlman, M. and Schmidt, C., 225–250. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Schram, A. 2005. Artificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments. Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar