Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T12:02:47.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identity, ethics and behavioural welfare economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2023

Ivan Mitrouchev Open the ORCID record for Ivan Mitrouchev [Opens in a new window]  and
Valerio Buonomo
Ivan Mitrouchev*
Affiliation:
IESEG School of Management, Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9221 – LEM – Lille Economie Management, F-59000 Lille, France
Valerio Buonomo
Affiliation:
Centre for Philosophy of Time, Department of Philosophy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Ivan Mitrouchev; Email: i.mitrouchev@ieseg.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multiple selves is a conventional assumption in behavioural welfare economics for modelling intrapersonal well-being. Yet an important question is which self has normative authority over others. In this paper, we advance an argument for what we call the ‘ontological approach’ to personal identity in behavioural welfare economics. According to this approach, ethical questions – such as which preference should be granted normative authority over another – can be informed by the ontological criterion of personal persistence, which aims at determining what it takes for an individual to persist from one time to another.

Keywords

Multiple selvesontologypreference reversalstimewell-beingB41D15I31

Information

Type
Article
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , July 2024 , pp. 310 - 336
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ainslie, G. 1975. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin 82, 463–496.10.1037/h0076860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2002. Self-confidence and personal motivation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 871–915.10.1162/003355302760193913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2003. Self-knowledge and self-regulation: an economic approach. In The Psychology of Economic Decisions. Volume One: Rationality and Well-Being, ed. Brocas, I. and Carrillo, J., 137–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, D.J., Choi, J.J. and Strickland, A.J. 2010. Social identity and preferences. American Economic Review 100, 1913–1928.10.1257/aer.100.4.1913CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernheim, B.D. 2009. Behavioral welfare economics. Journal of the European Economic Association 7, 267–319.10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B.D. 2016. The good, the bad, and the ugly: a unified approach to behavioral welfare economics. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 7, 12–68.10.1017/bca.2016.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B.D. and Rangel, A. 2007. Toward choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. American Economic Review 97, 464–470.10.1257/aer.97.2.464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B.D. and Rangel, A. 2009. Beyond revealed preference: choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, 51–104.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshears, J., Choi, J.J., Laibson, D. and Madrian, B.C. 2008. How are preferences revealed? Journal of Public Economics 92, 1787–1794.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.04.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blatti, S. and Snowdon, P.F., eds. 2016. Essays on Animalism: Persons, Animals, and Identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608751.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buonomo, V. 2018. A brief guide to personal persistence. In The Persistence of Persons: Studies in the Metaphysics of Personal Identity over Time, ed. Buonomo, V., 7–18. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid: Editiones Scholasticae.Google Scholar
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. 2003. Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for ‘asymmetric paternalism’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151, 1211–1254.10.2307/3312889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. and Li, S.X. 2009. Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review 99, 431–57.10.1257/aer.99.1.431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, E. 1999. Metaphysics and the morality of abortion. Mind 108, 619–646.10.1093/mind/108.432.619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.B. 2011. Individuals and Identity in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, D. 2005. Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dold, M.F. and Schubert, C. 2018. Toward a behavioral foundation of normative economics. Review of Behavioral Economics 5, 221–241.10.1561/105.00000097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferey, S. 2011. Paternalisme libéral et pluralité du moi (Libertarian paternalism and multiple-selves). Revue Économique 62, 737–750.10.3917/reco.624.0737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, F. and Hédoin, C. 2017. From identity to agency in positive and normative economics. Forum for Social Economics 50, 1–17.Google Scholar
Gul, F. and Pesendorfer, W. 2001. Temptation and self-control. Econometrica 69, 1403–1435.10.1111/1468-0262.00252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hédoin, C. 2015. From utilitarianism to paternalism: when behavioral economics meets moral philosophy. Revue de Philosophie Économique 16, 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershenov, D. 2005. Do dead bodies pose a problem for biological approaches to personal identity? Mind 114, 31–59.10.1093/mind/fzi031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, U., Kirman, A. and Teschl, M. 2007. Changing identity: the emergence of social groups. Princeton, NJ: Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science, Economics Working Papers.Google Scholar
Infante, G., Lecouteux, G. and Sugden, R. 2016. Preference purification and the inner rational agent: a critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 23, 1–25.10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. 1994. New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150, 18–36.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C.M. 1989. Personal identity and the unity of agency: a Kantian response to Parfit. Philosophy & Public Affairs 18, 101–132.Google Scholar
Köszegi, B. and Rabin, M. 2007. Mistakes in choice-based welfare analysis. American Economic Review 97, 477–481.10.1257/aer.97.2.477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laibson, D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 443–477.10.1162/003355397555253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecouteux, G. 2015. In search of lost nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6, 397–408.10.1007/s13164-015-0265-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecouteux, G. 2016. From homo economicus to homo psychologicus: the Paretian foundations of behavioural paternalism. Œconomia 6, 175–200.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and Thaler, R. 1989. Anomalies: intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 181–193.10.1257/jep.3.4.181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, E.J. 2012. The probable simplicity of personal identity. In Personal Identity: Complex or Simple?, ed. Gasser, G. and Stefan, M., 137–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028486.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1989. The virtues, the unity of a human life and the concept of a tradition. In Why Narrative?, ed. Hauerwas, S. and Jones, L. G., 89–110. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Martin, R. 1998. Self-Concern: An Experiential Approach to What Matters in Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McMahan, J. 2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195079981.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuillin, B. and Sugden, R. 2012. Reconciling normative and behavioural economics: the problems to be solved. Social Choice and Welfare 38, 553–567.10.1007/s00355-011-0627-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, H.W. 1998. Animalism versus Lockeanism: a current controversy. Philosophical Quarterly 48, 302–318.10.1111/1467-9213.00102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. and Sen, A., eds. 1993. The Quality of Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198287976.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, E.T. 1997. The Human Animal: Personal Identity without Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, E.T. 2003. An argument for animalism. In Personal Identity, ed. Martin, R. and Barresi, J., 318–334. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Olson, E.T. 2020. Personal identity. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), ed. E.N. Zalta. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/identity-personal/>..>Google Scholar
Olson, E.T. and Witt, K. 2019. Narrative and persistence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49, 419–434.10.1080/00455091.2018.1486674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, D. 2005. Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, D. 2014. Philosophy of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137318756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovane, C. 1998. The Bounds of Agency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schechtman, M. 1996. The Constitution of Selves. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schechtman, M. 2014. Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical Concerns, and the Unity of a Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684878.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, M. 2020. Glad it happened: personal identity and ethical depth. Journal of Consciousness Studies 27, 95–114.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, D. 2019. Personal identity and ethics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), ed. E.N. Zalta. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/identity-ethics/>..>Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2004. The opportunity criterion: consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review 94, 1014–1033.10.1257/0002828042002714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. 2015. Looking for a psychology for the inner rational agent. Social Theory and Practice 41, 579–598.10.5840/soctheorpract201541432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. 2018. The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist’s Defence of the Market. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198825142.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C.R. 2015. Nudges, agency, and abstraction: a reply to critics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6, 511–529.10.1007/s13164-015-0266-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C.R. 2019. On Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 1984. Personal identity: the dualist theory. In Personal Identity, ed. Sydney, S. and Swinburne, R., 3–66. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R.H. and Shefrin, H.M. 1981. An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy 89, 392–406.10.1086/260971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. 2003. Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review 93, 175–179.10.1257/000282803321947001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Rev. and expanded edn). New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1970. The self and the future. Philosophical Review 79, 161–180.10.2307/2183946CrossRefGoogle Scholar