Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-09T07:06:00.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critique of the entrepreneurial theory of ownership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2025

Konstantin Morozov Open the ORCID record for Konstantin Morozov [Opens in a new window]
Konstantin Morozov*
Affiliation:
RAS Institute of Philosophy. 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation
*
Email: lovecraft.wittgenstein@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a critique of Sergei Sazonov’s entrepreneurial theory of ownership. The article first reconstructs Sazonov’s response to the private duty imposition objection. It then demonstrates that Sazonov’s theory cannot overcome this objection because it is based on an ambiguity in the meaning of the word ‘use’. The entrepreneurial theory of ownership understands ‘use’ in a rather narrow and contradictory sense, which differs from the meaning in which this concept appears in objections to theories of original appropriation.

Keywords

Libertarianismnatural rightsprivate ownershipdistributive justiceoriginal appropriation

Information

Type
Reply
Information
Economics & Philosophy , First View , pp. 1 - 9
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Attas, D. 2003. The negative principle of just appropriation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33, 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2003.10716547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D.J. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christmas, B. 2020. Ambidextrous Lockeanism. Economics & Philosophy 36, 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267119000038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmas, B. 2021. Property and Justice: A Liberal Theory of Natural Rights. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G.A. 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, A. 2014. Private ownership and the standing to say so. University of Toronto Law Journal 64, 402–441.10.3138/utlj.2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R.A. 1995. Principles for a Free Society: Reconciling Individual Liberty with the Common Good. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Exdell, J. 1977. Distributive justice: Nozick on property rights. Ethics 87, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1086/292025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feser, E. 2005. There is no such thing as an unjust initial acquisition. Social Philosophy & Policy 22, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052505041038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, D.D. 1973. The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibbard, A. 2000. Natural property rights. In Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate, eds Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H., 23–30. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Grunebaum, J.O. 2000. Autonomous ownership. In Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate, eds Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H., 48–73. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W.N. 1917. Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal 26, 710–770.10.2307/786270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intropi, P. 2024. Reciprocal libertarianism. European Journal of Political Theory 23, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221099659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirzner, I.M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I.M. 1989. Discovery, Capitalism and Distributive Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I.M. 2000. Entrepreneurship, entitlement, and economic justice. In Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate, eds Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H., 191–213. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1960 [1689]. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lomasky, L.E. 1987. Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Machan, T.R. 2009. Self-ownership and the Lockean proviso. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393108323472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, E. 1995. The self-ownership proviso: a new and improved Lockean proviso. Social Philosophy & Policy 12, 186–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, E. 2009. What is left in left-libertarianism? In Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges, eds de Wijze, S., Kramer, M.H. and Carter, I., 101–131. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narveson, J. 1999. Property rights: original acquisition and Lockean provisos. Public Affairs Quarterly 13, 205–227.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Otsuka, M. 2003. Libertarianism Without Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243956.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. Some reasons for the maximin criterion. In Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, S.R., 225–231. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674054516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roark, E. 2013. Removing the Commons: A Lockean Left-Libertarian Approach to the Just Use and Appropriation of Natural Resources. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.N. 2000. Property and exchange. In Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate, eds Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H., 214–227. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Russell, D.C. 2010. Embodiment and self-ownership. Social Philosophy & Policy 27, 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazonov, S. 2022. Private duty creation in theories of distributive justice. Social Theory and Practice 48, 379–401. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract202231160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazonov, S. 2025. The entrepreneurial theory of ownership. Economics & Philosophy 41, 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267124000087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtz, D. 2010. Property and justice. Social Philosophy & Policy 27, 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spafford, J. 2021. Social anarchism and the rejection of private property. In The Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought, eds Chartier, G. and Van Schoelandt, C., 327–341. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315185255 Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 1994. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomson, J.J. 1992. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasi, J. 2012. Free Market Fairness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torpman, O. 2023. Mid-libertarianism and the utilitarian proviso. Journal of Value Inquiry 57, 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-021-09850-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, P. and Mazor, J.M. 2018. Libertarianism, left and right. In The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice, ed. Olsaretti, S., 129–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.3 Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P., Steiner, H. and Otsuka, M. 2005. Why left-libertarianism is not incoherent, indeterminate, or irrelevant: a reply to Fried. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00030.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vossen, B. 2015. Imposing duties and original appropriation. Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vossen, B. 2022. Property rights. In The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism, eds Zwolinski, M. and Ferguson, B., 120–134. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrousalis, N. 2011. Libertarian socialism: a better reconciliation between equality and self-ownership. Social Theory and Practice 37, 211–226.10.5840/soctheorpract201137213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. 1998. Original acquisition of private property. Mind 107, 799–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/107.428.799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, F. 2019. Three types of sufficientarian libertarianism. Res Publica 25, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-018-9400-y Google Scholar
Wendt, F. 2022. The project pursuit argument for self-ownership and private property. Social Theory and Practice 48, 583–605. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract2022531165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwolinski, M. 2015. Property rights, coercion, and the welfare state: the libertarian case for a basic income for all. Independent Review 19, 515–529.Google Scholar