Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-mz6gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T12:33:19.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to ‘Safeguarding and the law’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2025

Christopher Hill
Christopher Hill*
Affiliation:
Bishop of Guildford, 2004–2013
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Church of Englandecclesiastical lawMakin Reviewsafeguarding

Information

Type
Comment
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2025 , pp. 380 - 383
Check for updates
Copyright
© Ecclesiastical Law Society 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 P Collier, ‘Safeguarding and the law’ (2025) 27 Ecc LJ 355–379.

2 Ibid, 356.

3 Ibid, 357–358.

4 Ibid, 358–359.

5 cf. Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016.

6 Ecclesiastical Offices (Terms of Service) Regulations 2009. See further M Hill, Ecclesiastical Law, 4th edn (Oxford, 2018), paras 4.43–4.44.

7 Collier (note 1), 369.

8 Canon C8, para 3.

9 See further House of Bishops’ Policy on Granting Permission to Officiate (July 2018), paras 6.2–6.3.

10 Clergy Discipline Measure 2003, s 8(4), soon to be replaced (when it comes into force) by the Clergy Conduct Measure 2025, s 3(4).

11 Collier (note 1), 370–371.

12 Ibid, 371.

13 Ibid, 371–372.

14 Ibid, 372–375.

15 Ibid, 375.

16 Ibid, 377.

17 Ibid, 377–378.

18 Ibid, 378–379.