Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T23:21:03.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXV.—A Study in Chromosome Reduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

A. Anstruther Lawson
A. Anstruther Lawson
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Botany, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although the amount of active research that has been carried on during the past few years on the question of chromosome reduction and relative problems has been very great, the nuclear activities here concerned are still far from being understood. We are not yet in a position to draw general conclusions in regard to meiotic phenomena. It therefore seems to me desirable that all observations of fact and rational interpretations should be placed on record, so that when it becomes possible to generalise, all lines of evidence may be available.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , 1913 , pp. 601 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Allen, C. E., 1903, “The Early Stages in Spindle-Formation in the Pollen Mother-cells of Larix.” Ann. Bot., vol. xvii. p. 281, 1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. E., 1905, “Nuclear Division in the Pollen Mother-cells of Lilium Canadense.” Ann. Bot., vol. xix. p. 189, 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. E., 1905, “Das Verhalten der Kernsubstanzen der Synapsis in den Pollenmutterzellen von Lilium Canadense.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xlii. p. 72, 1905.Google Scholar
Belajeff, W., 1894, “Zur Kenntniss der Karyokinese den Pflanzen.” Flora, lxxix. p. 430, 1894.Google Scholar
Berghs, J., 1904, “La formation des chromosomes hétérotypiques dans la sporogénèse végétale.” La Cellule, xxii. p. 43, 1904.Google Scholar
Berghs, J., 1905, “La formation des chromosomes hétérotypiques dans la sporogénèse végétale.” La Cellule, xxii. p. 141, 1905.Google Scholar
Berghs, J., 1905, “Le fuseau hétérotypique de Paris quadrafolia.” La Cellule, xxii. p. 203, 1905.Google Scholar
Cardiff, J. D., 1906, “A Study of Synapsis and Reduction.” Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, xxxiii. p. 271, 1906.Google Scholar
Davis, B. M., 1899, “The Spore Mother-cells of Anthoceros.” Bot. Gaz.Google Scholar
Davis, B. M., 1909, “Pollen Development of Œnothera grandiflora.” Ann. Bot., xxiii. p. 551, 1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. M., “The Reduction Division of Œnothera biennis.” Ann. Bot., xxiv. p. 631, 1910.Google Scholar
Davis, B. M., 1911, “Cytological Studies on Œnothera III. A comparison of the Reduction Divisions of Œnothera Lamarkiana and O. Gigas.” Ann. Bot., xxv., No. c., p. 941, 1911.Google Scholar
Digby, L., 1910, “The Somatic, Premeiotic, and Meiotic Nuclear Divisions in Galtonia candicans.” Ann. Bot., vol. xxiv., No. xcvi., 1910.Google Scholar
Dixon, H. H., 1901, “On the First Mitosis of the Spore Mother-cells of Lilium.” Notes Bot. Sch. Trin. Coll. Dublin, 1901.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., 1893, “On Nuclear Division in the Pollen Mother-cells of Lilium martagon.” Ann. Bot., vii. p. 392, 1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J. B., 1895, “Ueber Kerntheilung in Lilium Antheren, besonders in Bezug auf die Centrosomenfrage.” Flora, lxxx. p. 56, 1895.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., and Moore, , 1905, “On the Meiotic Phase in Animals and Plants.” Quar. Jour. Micro. Soc., xlviii. p. 489, 1905.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., and Digby, L., 1910, “On the Cytological Features exhibited by certain Varietal and Hybrid Ferns.” Ann. Bot., xxiv. p. 191, 1910.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., 1912, “Nuclear Osmosis and its assumed Relation to Nuclear Division.” New. Phyt., vol. xi., No. 4, April 1912.Google Scholar
Fresendall, A., 1912, “Cytologische und Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Myricaria Germanica. 1912.Google Scholar
Gates, R. R., 1909, “The Behaviour of Chromosome in Œnothera lata × O. gigas.” Bot Gaz., xlviii. p. 179, 1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, R. R., 1908, “A Study of Reduction in Œnothera rubrinervis.” Bot. Gaz., xliii. p. 1, 1908.Google Scholar
Gates, R. R., 1911, “The Mode of Chromosome Reduction.” Bot. Gaz., li. p. 32.1, 1911.Google Scholar
Grégoire, V. et Wygearts, 1903, “La reconstitution du noyau et la formation des chromosomes dans les cinises somatiques.” La Cellule, xxi., 1903.Google Scholar
Grégoire, V. et Wygearts, 1906, “L'Element chromosomique dans les cellules végétales.” La Cellule, xxiii. p. 311, 1906.Google Scholar
Grégoire, V. et Wygearts, 1907, “La Formation des Gemini hétérotypiques.” La Cellule, xxiv. p. 369, 1907.Google Scholar
Grégoire, V. Et Wygearts, 1910, “Les Cinises de maturation dans les Deux Règnes.” La Cellule, xxvi. p. 223, 1910.Google Scholar
Hartog, M., 1905, “The Dual Force of the Dividing Cell.” Pt. I. The achromatic spindle figure illustrated by magnetic chains of force, Proc. Roy. Soc. B., lxxvi. p. 548, 1905.Google Scholar
Juel, O., 1897, “Die kerntheilungen in den Pollenmutterzellen von Hemerocallis fulva, und die bei denselben auftreten den Unregelmässigkeiten.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxx. p. 205, 1897.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1900, “Origin of the Cones of the Multipolar Spindle in Gladiolus.” Bot Gaz., xxx p. 145, 1900.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1903, “On the Relationship of the Nuclear Membrane to the Protoplast.” Bot. Gaz., xxxv. p. 305, 1903.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1903, “Studies in Spindle Formation.” Bot. Gaz., xxxvi. p. 81, 1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1911A, “The Phase of the Nucleus known as Synapsis.” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvii., pt. iii. p. 591, 1911.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1911B, “Nuclear Osmosis as a Factor in Mitosis.” Trans. Roy. Soe. Edin., vol. xlviii., pt. i. p. 137, 1911.Google Scholar
Lundegardh, H., 1909, “Über Reduktionsteilung in den Pollenmutterzellen einiger dikotylen Pflanzen.” Sv. Bot. Tids. Stockholm, III. i. p. 78, 1909.Google Scholar
Miyake, K., 1905, “Ueber Reduktionsteilung in den Pollenmutterzellen einigen Monokotylen.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xlii. p. 83, 1905.Google Scholar
Moore, A. C., 1903, “The Mitosis in the Spore Mother-cell of Pallavicinia.” Bot. Gaz., xxxvi. p. 384, 1903.Google Scholar
Mottier, D. M., 1898, “Ueber das Verhalten der Kerne der Entwickelung des Embryosacks und die Vorgänge bie der Befruchtung.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxxi. p. 125, 1898.Google Scholar
Mottier, D. M., 1897, “Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Kerntheilung in den Pollenmutterzellen einiger Monokotylen und Dikotylen.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxx. p. 169, 1897.Google Scholar
Mottier, D. M., 1907, “The Development of the Heterotypic Chromosomes in Pollen Mother-cells.” Ann. Bot., xxi. p. 309, 1907.Google Scholar
Müller, H. A. Clemens, 1912, “Kernstudien an Pflanzen.” Archiv f. Zellforchung, Bd. 8, H. 1, 1912.Google Scholar
Nemec, B., 1899, “Ueber die karyokinetische Kerntheilung in der Wurzelspitze von Allium cepa.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxxiii. p. 313, 1899.Google Scholar
Osterhout, W. J. V., 1897, “Ueber Entstehung der karyokinetischen Spindel bei Equisetum.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxx. p. 159, 1897.Google Scholar
Osterhout, W. J. V., 1902, “Spindle Formation in Agave.” Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci., iii., Bot. ii. p. 255, 1902.Google Scholar
Overton, J. B., 1909, “On the Organisation of the Nuclei in the Pollen Mother-cells of Certain Plants.” Ann. Bot., xxiii., 1909.Google Scholar
Peirce, G. J., Plant Physiology. New York, 1903.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, W., 1890, Zur Kenntniss der Plasmahaut und der Vacuolen, etc. Leipzig, 1890.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, W., 1897, Pflanzenphyeiologie. Leipzig, 1897.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, W., 1900, Physiology of Plants. Translated by Ewart, , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1900.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, O., 1907, “Zur Kenntniss der präsynaptischen Entwicklungsphasen der Reduktionsteilung.” Sv. Bot. Tids. Stockholm, I. iv., 1907.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, O., 1909. “Zur Kenntniss von den Tetradenteilungen der Compositen.” Sv. Bot. Tids. Stockholm, III. L, 1909.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, O., 1909, “Über den Bau des Ruhekerns.” Sv. Bot. Tids. Stockholm, III. ii., 1909.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, O., 1909, “Über die chromosomenzahlen bei Taraxacum und Rosa.” Sv. Bot. Tids. Stockholm, Bd. III. ii., 1909.Google Scholar
Sachs, J., 1875, “Text-Book of Botany.” Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1875.Google Scholar
Sargant, E., 1897, “The Formation of the Sexual Nuclei in Lilium Martagon.” Ann. Bot., xi. 1, 1897.Google Scholar
Schaffner, J. H., 1909. “The Reduction Division in the Microsporocytes of Agave virginica.” Bot. Gaz., vol. xlvii. p. 198, 1909.Google Scholar
Smith, R. W., 1900, “The Achromatic Spindle in the Spore Mother-cells of Osmunda regalis.” Bot. Gaz., xxx. p. 361, 1900.Google Scholar
Stomps, T. J., 1910, Kerndeeling en Synapsis bij Spinacia Oleracea. Amsterdam, 1910.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1882, “Ueber den Teilungsvorgang der Zellkerne und das Verhältniss der Kerntheilung zur Zelltheilung.” Arch. Mikr. Anat., xxi. p. 476, 1882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1900, “Ueber Reduktionsteilung, Spiudelbildung, Centrosomen und Cilienbilder im Pflanzenreich,” Hist. Beitr., vi. p. 224, 1900.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1905, “Typische und allotypische Kernteilung.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xlii. p. 1, 1905.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1907, “Ueber die Individuleitat der chromosomen und die Pfropfhybriden-Frage.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xliv. p. 482, 1907.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, S., 1906, “The Life History of Polysiphonia.” Bot. Gaz., xlii. p. 401, 1906.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, S., 1908, “Sporogenesis in Nephrodium.” Bot. Gaz., xlv. p. 1, 1908.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, S., 1910, “Chromosomes in Osmunda.” Bot. Gaz., xlix. p. 1, 1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar