Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T12:41:38.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Représentationnalisme et attention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

ÉMILE THALABARD
ÉMILE THALABARD*
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Sorbonne — Paris IV
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is a defence of representationalism against the objection ofphenomenal saliency, which Chalmers, Nickel and Speaks have developed. Accordingto my approach, covert shifts of attention enhance the resolution of perceptualrepresentations at fixation point. This local enhancement accounts for thesaliency effect, typical of focal attention, and preserves therepresentationalist intuition.

Dans cet article, je défends le représentationnalismecontre l’objection de la saillance phénoménale,développée notamment par Chalmers, Nickel et Speaks. Selonmon approche, les déplacements couverts de l’attentionaméliorent la résolution des représentationsperceptives au point de fixation. Cette amélioration locale permetd’expliquer l’effet de saillance, typique del’attention focale, et de préserver l’intuitionreprésentationnaliste.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 551 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Références bibliographiques

Armstrong, Katherine M. 2011 «Covert Spatial Attention and Saccade Planning», dans Mole, Christopher, Smithies, Duncan et Wu, Wayne, dir., Attention, Philosophical and Psychological Essays, New York (NY), Oxford University Press, p. 78–96.Google Scholar
Block, Ned 1995 «On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness», Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 18, n° 2, p. 227–247.Google Scholar
Block, Ned 2007 «Consciousness, Accessibility and the Mesh between Psychology and Neuroscience», Behavioral and Brain Studies, vol. 30, nos5-6, p. 481–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, Ned 2010 «Attention and Mental Paint», Philosophical Issues, vol. 20, p. 23–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Alex 2001 «Intentionalism Defended», The Philosophical Review, vol. 110, n° 2, p. 199–240.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Marisaet al. 2004 «Attention Alters Appearances», Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, n° 3, p. 308–313.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. 2007 «The Hard Problem of Consciousness», dans Velmans, Max et Schneider, Susan, dir., The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, Malden (MA)/Oxford, Blackwell, p. 225–235.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. 2010 «The Representational Character of Consciousness» [2004], dans The Character of Consciousness, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 339–379.Google Scholar
Clarke, Thompson 1966 «Seeing Surfaces and Physical Objects», in Black, Max, dir., Philosophy in America, Londres, Allen et Unwin, p. 98–114.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael A. et Dennett, Daniel C. 2011 «Consciousness Cannot be Separated from Access», Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 15, n° 8, p. 358–364.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas et Naccache, Lionel 2001 «Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness: Basic Evidence and a Workspace Framework», dans Dehaene, Stanislas, dir., The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness, Cambridge (MA)/Amsterdam, MIT Press/Elsevier, p. 1–37.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred 1995 Naturalizing the Mind, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grush, Rick 2007 «A Plug for Generic Phenomenology», Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 30, nos5-6, p. 504–505.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1990 «The Intrinsic Quality of Experience», Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 4, p. 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Christopher S. 2009 Consciousness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1890 The Principles of Psychology, Mineola (NY), Dover.Google Scholar
Kammerer, François 2011 «Pourquoi le représentationnalisme ne peut pas résoudre le “problème difficile” de la conscience phénoménale», Revue étudiante de philosophie analytique, vol. 4, p. 41–53.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon 1998 The Mind in a Physical World, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy 2003 «What’s So Transparent about Transparency?», Philosophical Studies, vol. 115, n° 3, p. 225–244.Google Scholar
Knudsen, Eric I. 2007 «Fundamental Components of Attention», Annual Review of Neurosciences, vol. 30, p. 57–78.Google Scholar
Külpe, Oswald 1902 «The Problem of Attention», The Monist, vol. 13, n° 1, p. 38–68.Google Scholar
LaBerge, David 1995 Attentional Processing. The Brain’s Art of Mindfulness, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lecas, Jean-Claude 1992 L’attention visuelle: de la conscience aux neurosciences, Liège, Mardaga.Google Scholar
MacPherson, Fiona 2006 «Ambiguous Figures and the Content of Experience», Noûs, vol. 40, n° 1, p. 82–117.Google Scholar
Mole, Christopher, Smithies, Duncan et Wu, Wayne, dir. 2011 Attention. Philosophical and Psychological Essays, New York (NY), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, Jeffrey et Desimone, Robert 1985 «Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex», Science, vol. 229, n° 4715, p. 782–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanay, Bence 2010 «Attention and Perceptual Content», Analysis, vol. 70, n° 2, p. 263–270.Google Scholar
Nickel, Bernard 2007 «Against Intentionalism», Philosophical Studies, vol. 136, n° 3, p. 279–304.Google Scholar
Papineau, David 2007 «Reuniting (Scene) Phenomenology with Scene Access», Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 30, nos5-6, p. 521.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 1983 Sense and Content. Experience, Thought, and Their Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 1998 «Conscious Attitudes, Attention, and Self-Knowledge», dans Wright, Crispin, Smith, Barry C. et Macdonald, Cynthia, dir., Knowing Our Own Minds, New York (NY), Oxford University Press, p. 63–98.Google Scholar
Prinzmetal, Williamet al. 1997 «The Phenomenology of Attention 2: Brightness and Contrast», Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 6, p. 372–412.Google Scholar
Prinzmetal, Williamet al. 1998 «Phenomenology of Attention 1: Color, Location, Orientation and Spatial Frequency», Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 24, n° 1, p. 261–282.Google Scholar
Prinzmetal, Williamet al. 2008 «Involuntary Attention and Brightness Contrast», Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 70, n° 7, p. 1139–1150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, Keith A. 2006 «Does Attention Alter Appearance?», Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 68, n° 5, p. 800–814.Google Scholar
Seager, William et Bourget, David 2007 «Representationalism about Consciousness», dans Velmans, Max et Schneider, Susan, dir., The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, Malden (MA)/Oxford, Blackwell, p. 261–275.Google Scholar
Speaks, Joseph 2009 «Attention and Intentionalism», Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 60, n° 239, p. 1–18.Google Scholar
Stazicker, James 2010a «Nanay on Attention and Intentionalism», manuscrit en ligne : <http://philosophy.berkeley.edu/file/576/Nanay_on_Attention___Intentionalism.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Stazicker, James 2010b «Attention, Visual Knowledge and Psychophysics: Discriminating the Determinable», manuscrit en ligne : <http://philosophy.berkeley.edu/file/ 575/Attention__Visual_Knowledge___Psychophysics_web.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Strayer, David Lee et Drews, Frank 2007 «Attention», dans Durso, Francis Thomaset al., dir., Handbook of Applied Cognition, West Sussex, Wiley & Sons, p. 29–54.Google Scholar
Titchener, Edward Bradford 1908 Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention, New York (NY), MacMillan.Google Scholar
Treisman, Anne Marie 2003 «Consciousness and Perceptual Binding», dans Cleeremans, Axel, dir., The Unity of Consciousness, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 95–113.Google Scholar
Tsal, Yehoshua et Shalev, Lilach 1996 «Inattention Magnifies Perceived Length: The Attentional Receptive Field Hypothesis», Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 22, n° 1, p. 233–243.Google Scholar
Tse, Peter U. 2005 «Voluntary Attention Modulates the Brightness of Overlapping Transparent Surfaces», Vision Research, vol. 45, n° 9, p. 1095–1098.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael 1992 «Visual Qualia and Visual Content», dans Crane, Tim, dir., The Contents of Experience, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tye, Michael 1995 Ten Problems of Consciousness, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tye, Michael 2000 Consciousness, Color, and Content, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Velmans, Max et Schneider, Susan, dir. 2007 The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, Malden (MA)/Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watzl, Sebastian 2011 «Attention as the Structuring of the Stream of Consciousness», dans Mole, Christopher, Smithies, Duncan et Wu, Wayne, dir., Attention. Philosophical and Psychological Essays, New York (NY), Oxford University Press, p. 145–173.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Jeremy M. 2000 «Visual Attention», dans De Valois, Karen K., dir., Seeing, San Diego (CA), Academic Press, p. 335–386.Google Scholar
Wu, Wayne 2011 «What is Conscious Attention?», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 82, n° 1, p. 93–120.Google Scholar
Yeshurun, Yaffa et Marisa, Carrasco 1998 «Attention Improves or Impairs Visual Performance by Enhancing Spatial Resolution», Nature, vol. 396, p. 72–75.Google Scholar