Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vpjdr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-26T05:42:53.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Rational and Voluntary Constraint Possible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Joe Mintoff
Joe Mintoff
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Spring 2000 , pp. 339 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Audi, Robert 1973 “Intending.” Journal of Philosophy, 70: 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, M. A. 1978 “Intending.” In Values and Morals, edited by Goldman, A. H. and Kim, J., pp. 163–84. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken 1993 “Bargaining and Morality.” In Rationality, Justice, and the Social Contract, edited by Gauthier, David and Sugden, Robert, pp. 131–56. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael 1987 Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Danielson, Peter 1992 Artificial Morality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1980 “Actions, Reasons and Causes.” In his Essays on Actions and Events, pp. 3–19. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1985 “Replies.” In Essays on Davidson, edited by Vermazen, B. and Hintikka, M., pp. 195–254. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne 1984 “A Causal Theory of Intending.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 21: 43–54.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David 1975 “Reason and Maximization.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 4: 411–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David 1986 Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David 1991 “Why Contractarianism?” In Contractarianism and Rational Choice: Essays on Gauthier's “Morals by Agreement,” edited by Vallentyne, Peter, pp. 15–30. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David 1994 “Assure and Threaten.” Ethics, 104: 690–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David 1973 A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, and Pargetter, Robert 1986 “Oughts, Options and Actualism.” Philosophical Review, 45: 233–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, Gregory 1986 “The Toxin Puzzle.” Analysis, 43: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, Gregory 1987 “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence.” In his Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence, pp. 15–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1984 “Devil's Bargains and the Real World.” In The Security Gamble: Deterrence Dilemmas in a Nuclear Age, edited by MacLean, Douglas, pp. 141–54. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Luban, D. 1986 “The Paradox of Deterrence Revived.” Philosophical Studies, 50:129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1988 “Libertarian Agency and Rational Morality: Action-Theoretic Objections to Gauthier's Dispositional Solution of the Compliance Problem.” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 26: 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1989 “Two Gauthiers?” Dialogue, 28: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1991a “Co-operative Solutions to the Prisoner's Dilemma.” Philosophical Studies, 64: 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1991b “McClennen's Early Co-operative Solution to the Prisoner's Dilemma.” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 29: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1991c “Preference's Progress: Rational Self-Alteration and the Rationality of Morality.” Dialogue, 30: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1991d “Retaliation Rationalized: Gauthier's Solution to the Deterrence Dilemma.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72: 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1992 “Preference Revision and the Paradoxes of Instrumental Rationality.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 22: 503–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, Edward 1990 Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred 1989 “Intention, Belief, and Intentional Action.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 26: 19–30.Google Scholar
McClennen, Edward 1991 “Motivational Ties.” Journal of Philosophical Research, 41: 431–42.Google Scholar
Mintoff, Joe 1993 “Rational Cooperation, Irrational Retaliation.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 74: 362–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintoff, Joe 1997 “Rational Cooperation, Intention and Reconsideration.” Ethics, 107: 612–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintoff, Joe 2000 “Buridan's Ass and Reducible Intentions.” Journal of Philosophical Research, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorobej, Mark 1986 “Gauthier on Deterrence.” Dialogue, 25: 471–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar