Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T12:29:46.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Incompatibility” in Plato's Sophist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Francis Jeffry Pelletier
Francis Jeffry Pelletier
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I want to consider a much-disputed reading of a certain critical area of Plato's Sophist. It is widely agreed by most commentators that in this text, between 255E and 259E there occurs a refutation of Parmenides' dictum that “one cannot say that which is not”, and that this is followed by an application of the foregoing discussion to the problems of sentiential falsity. (For a partial list of commentators, see bibliography.) It is also generally agreed that Plato uses the Form, The Different, for this purpose. What is not generally agreed upon is how Plato uses The Different.

Information

Type
Notes—Discussion
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 143 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ackrill, J. L. (1955) “Symplokē Eidōn”, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London (reprinted in Vlastos).Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1967) Prädication and Existenzaussage, Hypomnemata 18.Google Scholar
Keyt, David (1973) “The Falsity of ‘Theaetetus Flies’ (Sophist 263B)” in Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos (ed.) Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A.P.D., and Rorty, R.: Phronesis Supplementary Volume 1.Google Scholar
Lee, E. N. (1972) “Plato on Negation and Not-Being in the Sophist” Phil. Rev.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. and Mittelstrauss, J. (1966) “Theaitetos Fliegt”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1970) “Plato on Not-Being” (in Vlastos)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, J. A. (1968) “False Statement in the Sophistes”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory (1970) Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David (1970) “Sentence Meaning, Negation, and Plato's Problem of Not-Being” (in Vlastos).CrossRefGoogle Scholar