Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-17T19:34:46.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Family systems andadolescent development: Shared and nonshared risk and protective factors in nondivorced andremarried families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1998

THOMAS G. O'CONNOR
Affiliation:
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry
E. MAVIS HETHERINGTON
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
DAVID REISS
Affiliation:
George Washington University

Abstract

The primary goal of this research is to increase the goodness-of-fit between thetheoretical tenets of family systems theory and quantitative methods used to test systemshypotheses. A family systems perspective is applied to two specific research questionsconcerning family influences on adolescent development: To what extent are familial risk andprotective factors for psychopathology and competence shared or not shared by siblings and aredifferent family relationship patterns associated with optimal adolescent adjustment innondivorced and remarried families? Multirater and multimethod data from a national sample of516 nondivorced and remarried families from the Nonshared Environment and AdolescentDevelopment (NEAD) project were examined using a combination of cluster, factor, andregression analyses. Results indicated that the effects of an individual relationship on adolescentadjustment is moderated by the larger network of relationships in which it is embedded.Evidence for nonshared familial processes in predicting adolescent psychopathology was alsofound but only in a subset of families, and the mechanisms of influence were neither main effectsnor linear, as has been assumed by research to date. Results are discussed in light of familysystems models of relationship influences on development. These results illustrate how familysystems theory provides a specific example of contextualism as regards the development ofpsychopathology in adolescence.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable