Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T05:42:57.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The argillation of sub-marine tufts from the Mount Carmel, Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

Arieh Singer
Arieh Singer*
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, P.O.B. 12, Rehovot, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Absract

The alteration products of five sub-marine tuffs from the Mount Carmel were analysed chemically, by X-ray, D.T.A. and I.T.A. techniques and their mineralogical composition determined. Smectites are dominant in all the samples. In the less altered tuffs the smectite seems to consist of a mixture of saponite with a smectite from the beidellite-nontronite series. In the more intensely altered tuffs the saponite disappears and a swelling chlorite appears. The formation of the swelling chlorite is attributed to the degradation of the saponite. These mineralogical changes are accompanied by the loss of a large part of the alkali and alkaline earth cations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , July 1967 , pp. 101 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguilera, N.H. & Jackson, M.L. (1953) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. A. 17, 359.Google Scholar
Caillère, S. & Henin, S. (1949) Mineralog. Ma. 28, 612.Google Scholar
Carrol, D. & StarkeY, H.C. (1958) Clays Clay Mine. 7, 80.Google Scholar
Deer, W.A., Howm, R.A. & Zussman, J. (1962) Rock Forming, Minerals, Vol. 3, p. 234, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Egawa, T. (1964) Nature and Properties ol Allophane, p. 38. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Japanese Government.Google Scholar
Ewart, A. & Fieldes, M. (1962) Mineralog. Ma. 33, 237.Google Scholar
Faust, G.T. (1955) J. Wash. Acad. Sc. 45, 66.Google Scholar
Grim, R.E. (1953) Clay Mineralogy, p. 323. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Grim, R.E. & Vernet, J.P. (1961) Schweiz. miner, petrogr. Mit. 41, 65.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, I. & Jackson, M.L. (1960) Clays Clay Mine. 7, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, E.A. & Reynolds, H.H. (1939) Am. Mine. 24, 590.Google Scholar
HoneyBorne, D.B. (1951) Clay Miner. Bul. 1, 150.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. (1954) Clay Miner. Bul. 2, 120.Google Scholar
Milliken, T.H. JR, Mills, G.A. & Oblad, A.G. (1950) Discuss. Faraday So. 8, 279.Google Scholar
Page, J.B. (1943) Soil Sc. 56, 273.Google Scholar
Powers, M.C. (1959) Clays Clay Mine.6, 309.Google Scholar
Sand, L.B. & Ames, L.U JR (1957) Clays Clay Mine. 5, 39.Google Scholar
Sass, E. (1957) Unpublished M.Sc. thesis submitted to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E.R. & Heystek, H. (1953) Mineralog. Ma. 30, 201.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M. & Milne, I.A. (1960) Clays Clay Mine. 7, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.D. & Sergeant, G.A. (1963) Analyst, Lon. 88, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar