No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Training and utilisation of volunteers to bolster neurodevelopmental care in paediatric cardiology inpatient units
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 September 2025
Abstract
Background:
Children with CHD are at risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. Modifiable risk factors associated with hospitalisation that could impact neurodevelopment include being left alone for long periods of time with minimal interaction or opportunity to engage in developmentally appropriate play. Volunteers are an underutilised resource to help the medical team and families support neurodevelopment in cardiac care. Our Cardiac Inpatient Neurodevelopmental Care Optimization or CINCO team aimed to develop a volunteer programme specific to paediatric cardiac inpatient units.
Methods:
CINCO volunteers were recruited from the hospital volunteer pool and, in 2022, partnered with the University of Colorado to recruit health profession-interested students from under-represented backgrounds. All underwent hospital volunteer orientation and CINCO-specific training with cardiac child life, including education and shadowing. Volunteers completed an activity log and provided qualitative feedback.
Results:
Between September 2021 and October 2024, 43 volunteers were onboarded and worked a total of 754 shifts. There were 2310 patient interactions, with an average of 3 patients seen per shift. Volunteers held patients 1231 times, played with patients 1230 times, and read to patients 780 times.
Conclusions:
A dedicated cardiac volunteer programme is a feasible, low-cost, and low-risk way to enhance neurodevelopmental care for inpatient children with CHD. When parents or caregivers are not present, volunteers participate as therapy extenders and may offset the care burden for nurses. Furthermore, allowing parents breaks may support their mental health, and increasing neurodevelopmental stimulation through volunteer interactions may mitigate disadvantageous aspects of a hospitalisation for neurodevelopment.
Information
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Gaynor, JW, Ittenbach, RF, Gerdes, M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in preschool survivors of the Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 1276–1283.e5.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, K, Malik, L, Jones, C, et al. Abnormal infant neurobehavior and later neurodevelopmental delays in children with critical CHD. Cardiol Young 2023; 33: 1102–1111.10.1017/S1047951122002013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisanti, AJ, Uzark, KC, Harrison, TM, et al. Developmental care for hospitalized infants with complex congenital heart disease: a science advisory from the American heart association. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12: e028489–e89.10.1161/JAHA.122.028489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verrall, CE, Patel, S, Travitz, L, et al. Biological and structural phenotypes associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in congenital heart disease. Transl Pediatr 2023; 12: 768–786.10.21037/tp-22-687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineda, R, Bender, J, Hall, B, et al. Parent participation in the neonatal intensive care unit: predictors and relationships to neurobehavior and developmental outcomes. Early Hum Dev 2018; 117: 32–38.10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.12.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, LC, Duncan, MM, Smith, GC, et al. Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior. J Perinatol Official J CA Perinat Assoc 2013; 33: 636–641.Google ScholarPubMed
Garner, A, Yogman, M. Committee on psychosocial aspects of child and family health, section on developmental and behavioral pediatrics, council on early childhood. Preventing childhood toxic stress: partnering with families and communities to promote relational health. Pediatrics 2021; 148: e2021052582.10.1542/peds.2021-052582CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clubbs, BH, Barnette, AR, Gray, N, et al. A community hospital NICU developmental care partner program: feasibility and association with decreased nurse burnout without increased infant infection rates. Adv Neonatal Care 2019; 19: 311–320.10.1097/ANC.0000000000000600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushroe, K, Lloyd, B, McDaneld, C, et al. Feasibility and impact of a pilot neonatal cuddler program on preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41: e870–e878.Google ScholarPubMed
Fritsch-deBruyn, R, Capalbo, M, Rea, A, et al. Cuddler program provides soothing answers. Neonatal Netw 1990; 8: 45–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, KR, Caprarola, SD, Clark, C, et al. Implementation of the cardiac inpatient neurodevelopmental care optimization (CINCO) programme: an interdisciplinary, generalisable approach to inpatient neurodevelopmental care. Cardiol Young 2023; 33: 2581–2588.10.1017/S1047951123000562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibold, DR, Rossi, SM, Berteotti, CR, et al. Volunteer involvement in a hospice care program. An examination of motives, activities. Am J Hosp Care 1987; 4: 43–55.10.1177/104990918700400209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niinomi, K, Soejima, M, Hiraga, K, et al. Effectiveness of a volunteer training program on the learning support of children in hospice palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 37: 100–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascuet, E, Beauchemin, L, Vaillancourt, R, et al. Volunteer satisfaction and program evaluation at a pediatric hospice. J Palliat Med 2012; 15: 567–572.10.1089/jpm.2011.0426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, N, MacDonald, C, Drobot, A, et al. A peer and volunteer program for patients and their families in the pediatric intensive care unit: a pilot program evaluation. Front Pediatr 2021; 9: 711083–711083.10.3389/fped.2021.711083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotchkiss, RB, Unruh, L, Fottler, MD. The role, measurement, and impact of volunteerism in hospitals. Nonprof Volunt Sec Q 2014; 43: 1111–1128.10.1177/0899764014549057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprarola et al. supplementary material
Caprarola et al. supplementary material
File
132.2 KB