Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-13T01:30:50.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Health-related quality of life outcomes for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries patients across the therapeutic spectrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2025

Anish R. Katta
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Program, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Shivni Patel
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Program, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Miza S. Hammoud
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Amol Pande
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Andrew Toth
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Samuel M. Hoenig
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Program, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Yibei Zhu
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Program, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Lin Chin
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Program, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Rashed Mahboubi
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Justin A. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Canada
Tara Karamlou*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron, OH, Canada Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Tara Karamlou; Email: tkaramlou@akronchildrens.org

Abstract

Objective:

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries is a rare congenital cardiac condition with varied presentations, complicating treatment decisions. This study evaluates the impact of medical management, physiologic repair, and anatomic repair on health-related quality of life.

Methods:

A cross-sectional follow-up was conducted on 50 congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries patients from a cohort of 240 at Cleveland Clinic (1995-2020). Health-related quality of life was assessed using MacNew and PROMIS-10 questionnaires. Echocardiographic data on systemic atrioventricular valvular regurgitation and systemic ventricular dysfunction were analysed. A time-varying coefficient model evaluated these factors’ impact on health-related quality of life.

Results:

Anatomic repair had significantly higher PROMIS-10 Physical T-scores compared to physiologic repair (median 50.9 vs 41.6, p = 0.04). MacNew Social scores were significantly higher for medical management compared to physiologic repair (median 6.8 vs 6.0, p = 0.02). Echocardiographic analysis revealed that systemic ventricular dysfunction had a stronger immediate impact on health-related quality of life. Systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation showed a delayed negative effect, significant at 6-10 years after echo, although this effect gradually decreased over time. Anatomic repair patients had better systemic ventricular function (84.6% normal), and less systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (69.2% had none) compared to medical management and physiologic repair groups.

Conclusions:

Anatomic repair improves health-related quality of life in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries patients, with physiologic repair showing some gains over time. Health-related quality of life data should provide important guidance regarding treatment decisions, especially in well-balanced congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries patients.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Anish Katta and Shivni Patel contributed equally to this work.

References

Hornung, TS, Calder, L. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Heart 2010; 96: 11541161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, TKS. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12: 12131218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Praagh, R. What is congenitally corrected transposition? N Engl J Med 1970; 282: 10971098CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWeert, KJ, Lancaster, T, Dorfman, AL. Congenitally corrected transposition: not correct at all. Curr Opin Cardiol 2023; 38: 358363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiramatsu, T, Matsumura, G, Konuma, T, et al. Long-term prognosis of double-switch operation for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries†, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42: 10041008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imamura, M, Drummond-Webb, JJ, Murphy, DJ, et al. Results of the double switch operation in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 100105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dissel, AC, Opotowsky, AR, Burchill, LJ, et al. End-stage heart failure in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: a multicentre study. Eur Heart J 2023; 44: 32783291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hraska, V, Duncan, BW, Mayer, JE, et al. Long-term outcome of surgically treated patients with corrected transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 182191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sano, T, Riesenfeld, T, Karl, TR, et al. Intermediate-term outcome after intracardiac repair of associated cardiac defects in patients with atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial discordance. Circulation 1995; 92: 272278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ilbawi, MN, DeLeon, SY, Backer, CL, et al. An alternative approach to the surgical management of physiologically corrected transposition with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis or atresia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 100: 410415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, LB, Kirklin, JW, Blackstone, EH, et al. Death and other events after cardiac repair in discordant atrioventricular connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90: 711728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karl, TR. The role of the Fontan operation in the treatment of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2011; 4: 103110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, BM, Rehman, M, Johnson, WD, et al. Healthcare providers versus patients’ understanding of health beliefs and values. Patient Exp J 2017; 4: 2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okunrintemi, V, Spatz, ES, Di Capua, P, et al. Patient-provider communication and health outcomes among individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017; 10: e003635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuel, CA, Mbah, O, Schaal, J, et al. The role of patient-physician relationship on health-related quality of life and pain in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28: 26152626.Google ScholarPubMed
Barrios, PA, Zia, A, Pettersson, G, et al. Outcomes of treatment pathways in 240 patients with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161: 10801093.e4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salim Hammoud, M, Gupta, S, McCloskey, O, et al. Abstract 15610: long term health related quality of life outcomes across the therapeutic spectrum in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries. Circulation 2022; 146: A15610A15610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeschke, R, Singer, J, Guyatt, GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terwee, CB, Peipert, JD, Chapman, R, et al. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 2021; 30: 27292754.Google ScholarPubMed
Dixon, T, Lim, LLY, Oldridge, NB. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: reference data for users. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 2002; 11: 173183.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, L, Hammoud, MS, Ghandour, H, et al. Does the ross operation out perform prosthetic aortic valve replacement in young adults in the long-term? 2025.Google Scholar
Longitudinal Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Novel Approach Using Automated EMR Follow-Up. 2024.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Samad, F, Kalvin, L, Bush, M, Tajik, AJ. A great imitator in adult cardiology practice: congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Congenit Heart Dis 2017; 12: 143152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitlinger, A, Yousuf Zafar, S. Health-related quality of life. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2018; 27: 675684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Megari, K. Quality of life in chronic disease patients. Health Psychol Res 2013; 1: e27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahr, PC, Radke, RM, Orwat, S, et al. Analysis of associations between congenital heart defect complexity and health-related quality of life using a meta-analytic strategy. Int J Cardiol 2015; 15: 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, C, Wang, J, Yang, H, et al. Heart failure and patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease from 15 Countries. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11: e024993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cotts, T, Malviya, S, Goldberg, C. Quality of life and perceived health status in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143: 885890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatterjee, A, Miller, NJ, Cribbs, MG, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of anatomic repair in congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries. World J Cardiol 2020; 12: 427436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Katta et al. supplementary material

Katta et al. supplementary material
Download Katta et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.4 MB