Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-08T09:07:00.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced recovery after minimally invasive mid-axillary thoracotomy approach for congenital heart surgical repairs in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2025

Ananya Bashyam
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
Ali Dodge-Khatami*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, University Clinic RWTH, Aachen, Germany
Nischal Gautam
Affiliation:
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Houston, TX, USA
Staci Cameron
Affiliation:
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Houston, TX, USA
Maria Matuszczak
Affiliation:
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Houston, TX, USA
Evelyn Griffin
Affiliation:
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Houston, TX, USA
Xu Zhang
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
Olga Pawelek
Affiliation:
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Houston, TX, USA
*
Corresponding author: Ali Dodge-Khatami; Email: adodgekhatam@ukaachen.de

Abstract

Background:

Clinical outcomes of a standardised enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, including thoracic epidural analgesia, were studied in children undergoing trans-atrial cardiac surgery via the right mid-axillary thoracotomy approach.

Methods:

This single-centre retrospective study examined 42 paediatric patients who underwent trans-atrial cardiac surgeries via the mid-axillary approach (2018 to 2020), of whom 30 received epidural catheters. The standardised enhanced recovery after surgery protocol included transesophageal echo-guided thoracic epidural catheter placement, multimodal analgesia, reduced opioid use, and planned early extubation and discharge. Clinical outcomes assessed included extubation times, postoperative analgesic requirements, ICU pain scores, hospital length of stay, and any complications related to regional anaesthesia or surgery.

Results:

Thirty patients received an epidural placed between the third and sixth thoracic interspace levels under transesophageal ultrasonography guidance. The median age was 42 months (range 3–156), and the median weight was 15.7 kg (range 4.9–61 kg). Epidural infusions were continued for a median of 52 hours postoperatively. The intraoperative fentanyl usage was a median of 4.5 mcg/kg (interquartile range (IQR) 2–9). Intraoperative extubation was achieved in 28 of the 30 patients. Median post-extubation pain scores in the first 6 and 12 hours were 0 (IQR 0), and postoperative rescue opioid requirements were low in epidural patients. There were no instances of tracheal reintubation, neuraxial blockade-related complications, or other anaesthesia-related adverse events.

Conclusion:

Through our standardised and reproducible anaesthetic protocol, we achieved excellent and nearly pain-free recovery in paediatric patients undergoing trans-atrial cardiac surgeries via the mid-axillary approach.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dodge-Khatami, A, Salazar, JD. Right axillary thoracotomy for transatrial repair of congenital heart defects: VSD, partial AV canal with mitral cleft, PAPVR or warden, Cor Triatriatum, and ASD. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 20: 384401.10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2016.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prêtre, R, Kadner, A, Dave, H, Dodge-Khatami, A, Bettex, D, Berger, F. Right axillary incision: a cosmetically superior approach to repair a wide range of congenital cardiac defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 277281.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Said, SM, Greathouse, KC, McCarthy, CM, et al. Safety and efficacy of right axillary thoracotomy for repair of congenital heart defects in children. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2023; 14: 4754.10.1177/21501351221127283CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge-Khatami, J, Dodge-Khatami, A. Advantages of a mini right axillary thoracotomy for congenital heart defect repair in children. Cardiol Young 2022; 32: 276281.10.1017/S1047951121001979CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge-Khatami, J, Dodge-Khatami, A, Nguyen, TD, Rüffer, A. Minimal invasive approaches for pediatric & congenital heart surgery: safe, reproducible, more cosmetic than through sternotomy, and here to stay. Transl Pediatr 2023; 12: 17441752.10.21037/tp-23-282CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo Rito, M, Brindicci, YCM, Moscatiello, M, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for simple congenital heart defects: preserving aesthetics without jeopardizing patient safety. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10: 452.Google ScholarPubMed
Peterson, KL, DeCampli, WM, Pike, NA, Robbins, RC, Reitz, BA. A report of two hundred twenty cases of regional anesthesia in pediatric cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 10141019.10.1097/00000539-200005000-00002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Pede, A, Morini, F, Lombardi, MH, et al. Comparison of regional vs. systemic analgesia for post-thoracotomy care in infants. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24: 569573.10.1111/pan.12380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsui, BCH, Wagner, A, Cave, D, Kearney, R. Thoracic and lumbar epidural analgesia via the caudal approach using electrical stimulation guidance in pediatric patients: a review of 289 patients. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 683689.10.1097/00000542-200403000-00032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caruso, TJ, Lawrence, K, Tsui, BCH. Regional anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019; 32: 674682.10.1097/ACO.0000000000000769CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Ghotra, GS, Dwivedi, D, et al. Common inflammatory markers and outcome after pediatric cardiac surgery with high thoracic epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2023; 14: 334344.10.1177/21501351221151053CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Kapoor, R, Mishra, S, Joshi, A, Tiwari, N, Ramamurthy, HR. Non-analgesic benefits of combined thoracic epidural analgesia with general anesthesia in on-pump pediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. Med J Armed Forces India 2024; 80: 8090.10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.01.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge-Khatami, A, Gil-Jaurena, JM, Hörer, J, et al. Over 3,000 minimally invasive thoracotomies from the european congenital heart surgeons association for quality repairs of the most common congenital heart defects: safe and routine for selected repairs. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2025; 16: 578584.10.1177/21501351251322155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ueda, K, Shields, BE, Brennan, TJ. Transesophageal echocardiography: a novel technique for guidance and placement of an epidural catheter in infants. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 219222.10.1097/ALN.0b013e318277a554CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco, D, Llamazares, J, Rincón, R, Ortiz, M, Vidal, F. Thoracic epidural anesthesia via the lumbar approach in infants and children. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 13121316.10.1097/00000542-199606000-00006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanada, S, Reinking, B, Kim, S, Ueda, K. Transesophageal echocardiography for thoracic spinal cord imaging and confirmation of epidural catheter placement in pediatrics. J Clin Anesth 2023; 91: 111231.10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmehil, C, Lee, KJ, Casella, S, Millan, D. Thoracic epidural anesthesia in congenital heart surgery. JTCVS Tech 2021; 11: 6466.10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horlocker, TT, Vandermeuelen, E, Kopp, SL, et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine evidence-based guidelines (Fourth edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43: 263.10.1097/AAP.0000000000000763CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Bashyam et al. supplementary material

Bashyam et al. supplementary material
Download Bashyam et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.5 KB