No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Electrocardiographic findings in newborns with bicuspid aortic valve
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 July 2025
Abstract
Background:
Bicuspid aortic valve is considered to have a multifactorial origin. Some research suggests a defect in neural crest cell signalling may increase the risk of developing bicuspid aortic valve, and also impact on the proximal conduction system.
Purpose:
To examine electrocardiographic parameters in unselected newborns from the general population diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve within 30 days after birth.
Methods:
This is a substudy of the Copenhagen Baby Heart Study; a multicentre, prospective, population-based cohort study with prenatal inclusion. Cardiac examination, including transthoracic echocardiography and electrocardiography, were obtained within 30 days after birth. Newborns diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve were matched 1:4 with newborns with structurally normal hearts based on age, sex, gestational age, weight, and length at examination.
Results:
A total of 127 newborns with bicuspid aortic valve (84 boys, median age 11 days) and 508 controls (336 boys, median age 11 days) were included. Newborns with bicuspid aortic valve had a significantly longer PR-interval (100 vs 96 ms, p = 0.011) and QRS duration (56 vs 54 ms, p = 0.042), and a significantly lower R-wave amplitude in V6 (759 vs 906 µV, p = 0.047) compared to controls. However, when correcting for multiple testing none of the results were significant.
Conclusion:
Newborns from the general population with bicuspid aortic valve demonstrated a slightly longer PR-interval, a longer QRS duration, and a lower maximum R-wave amplitude in V6 than matched controls, although non-significant after correcting for multiple testing. This may represent early signs of conduction abnormalities, but longitudinal follow-up will provide further clarification.
Information
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Sillesen, AS, Vøgg, O, Pihl, C, et al. Prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortopathy in newborns in copenhagen, Denmark. JAMA 2021; 325 (
6
): 561–567. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.27205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mordi, I, Tzemos, N. Bicuspid aortic valve disease: a comprehensive review. Cardiol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 196037. doi: 10.1155/2012/196037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Çelik, M, Mahtab, EAF, Bogers, AJJC. Surgical aortic valve replacement with concomitant aortic surgery in patients with purely bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortopathy. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2021; 8 (
2
): 16. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8020016.Google ScholarPubMed
Saha, S, Bastiaenen, R, Hayward, M, McEwan, JR. An undiagnosed bicuspid aortic valve can result in severe left ventricular failure. BMJ 2007; 334 (
7590
): 420–422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39065.624815.80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sievers, HH, Schmidtke, C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133 (
5
): 1226–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michelena, HI, Della Corte, A, Evangelista, A, et al. International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg 2021; 60 (
3
): 448–476. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niaz, T, Fernandes, SM, Sanders, SP, Michelena, H, Hagler, DJ. Clinical history and management of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2020; 63 (
4
): 425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.05.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modica, G, Sollazzo, F, Bianco, M, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve and premature ventricular beats in athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (
19
): 12188. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kappetein, AP, Gittenberger-de Groot, AC, Zwinderman, AH, Rohmer, J, Poelmann, RE, Huysmans, HA. The neural crest as a possible pathogenetic factor in coarctation of the aorta and bicuspid aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 102 (
6
): 830–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, T, Colbert, MC, Robbins, J. Neural crest cells retain multipotential characteristics in the developing valves and label the cardiac conduction system. Circ Res 2006; 98 (
12
): 1547–1554. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000227505.19472.69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamdan, A, Nassar, M, Schwammenthal, E, et al. Short membranous septum length in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis increases the risk of conduction disturbances. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2021; 15 (
4
): 339–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.10.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusner, JJ, Brown, JY, Gleason, TG, Edelman, ER. The natural history of bicuspid aortic valve disease. Struct Heart J Heart Team 2023; 7 (
2
): 100119. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, HS, Zaman, Q, Haft, JI, Melendez, S. Assessment of atrioventricular conduction in aortic valve disease. Br Heart J 1978; 40 (
8
): 911–917. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.8.911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karbasi-Afshar, R, Jonaidi-Jafari, N, Saburi, A, Khosravi, A. Atrioventricular block as the initial presentation of calcified bicuspid aortic valve. ARYA Atheroscler 2014; 10 (
1
): 59–64.Google Scholar
Sillesen, AS, Raja, AA, Pihl, C, et al. Copenhagen baby heart study: a population study of newborns with prenatal inclusion. Eur J Epidemiol 2019; 34 (
1
): 79–90. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0448-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vøgg, ROB, Basit, S, Raja, AA, et al. Cohort profile: the copenhagen baby heart study (CBHS). Int J Epidemiol 2022; 50 (
6
): 1778–1779m. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pærregaard, MM, Hvidemose, SO, Pihl, C, et al. Defining the normal QT interval in newborns: the natural history and reference values for the first 4 weeks of life. Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol 2021; 23 (
2
): 278–286. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa143.Google ScholarPubMed
Suwa, K, Rahsepar, AA, Geiger, J, et al. A left ventricle remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 39: 391–399. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02727-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hvidemose, SO, Pærregaard, MM, Pihl, CA, et al. Precordial ECG amplitudes in the days after birth: electrocardiographic changes during transition from fetal to neonatal circulation. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42 (
4
): 832–839. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02547-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lue, HC, Wu, MH, Wang, JK, et al. Normal ECG standards and percentile charts for infants, children and adolescents. Pediatr Neonatol 2022; 64: 256–273. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.07.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirshekar, MA, Mehran, L, Faraji Shahrivar, F. Association between maternal hypothyroidism, baby birth weight, and adult cardiovascular disease risk: insights from ECG measurements. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2024; 17 (
8
): 257–266. doi: 10.62347/TJQW7926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vohra, S, Koren, G. Hypothetical framework for a relationship between maternal thyroid function, nausea and vomiting of pregnancy, and congenital heart disease. Med Hypotheses 2001; 56 (
3
): 392–394. doi: 10.1054/mehy.2000.1210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krogager, ML, Kragholm, K, Skals, RK, et al. The relationship between serum potassium concentrations and electrocardiographic characteristics in 163,547 individuals from primary care. J Electrocardiol 2019; 57: 104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.09.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed