Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-s7dlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T12:45:31.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are resorbable implants about to become a reality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2006

Matthias Peuster ,
Phillip Beerbaum ,
Friedrich-Wilhelm Bach  and
Hansjoerg Hauser
Matthias Peuster
Affiliation:
Clinic for Congenital Heart Defects and Cardiovascular Implant Research Unit, Heart and Diabetes Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Phillip Beerbaum
Affiliation:
Clinic for Congenital Heart Defects and Cardiovascular Implant Research Unit, Heart and Diabetes Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Friedrich-Wilhelm Bach
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Science, University of Hannover, Garbsen, Germany
Hansjoerg Hauser
Affiliation:
German Research Center for Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Stentsbiodegradationcorrosionmagnesiumiron

Information

Type
Review
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 107 - 116
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Olmedo D, Fernandez MM, Guglielmotti MB, Cabrini RL. Macrophages related to dental implant failure. Implant Dentistry 2003; 12: 75–80.Google Scholar
Reclaru L, Lerf R, Eschler PY, Meyer JM. Corrosion behavior of a welded stainless-steel orthopedic implant. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 269–279.Google Scholar
Kraft CN, Diedrich O, Burian B, Schmitt O, Wimmer MA. Microvascular response of striated muscle to metal debris. A comparative in vivo study with titanium and stainless steel. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 133–141.Google Scholar
Koerten HK, Onderwater JJ, Koerten EW, Bernoski FP, Nelissen RG. Observations at the articular surface of hip prostheses: an analytical electron microscopy study on wear and corrosion. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54: 591–596.Google Scholar
Koster R, Vieluf D, Kiehn M, et al. Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet 2000; 356: 1895–1897.Google Scholar
Ryan MP, Williams DE, Chater RJ, Hutton BM, McPhail DS. Why stainless steel corrodes. Nature 2002; 415: 770–774.Google Scholar
Ries MW, Kampmann C, Rupprecht HJ, Hintereder G, Hafner G, Meyer J. Nickel release after implantation of the Amplatzer occluder. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 737–741.Google Scholar
Heintz C, Riepe G, Birken L, et al. Corroded nitinol wires in explanted aortic endografts: an important mechanism of failure? J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8: 248–253.Google Scholar
Peuster M, Fink C, von Schnakenburg C, Hausdorf G. Dissolving Tungsten Coils lack systemic toxicity but lead to elevated serum tungsten levels and recanalization of the previously occluded vessel. Cardiol Young 2002; 12: 229–235.Google Scholar
Van Belle E, Tio FO, Couffinhal T, Maillard L, Passeri J, Isner JM. Stent endothelialization. Time course, impact of local catheter delivery, feasibility of recombinant protein administration, and response to cytokine expedition. Circulation 1997; 95: 438–448.Google Scholar
Kreutzer J, Ryan CA, Wright Jr JA, et al. Acute animal studies of the STARFlex system: a new self-centering cardioSEAL septal occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49: 225–233.Google Scholar
Han YM, Gu X, Titus JL, et al. New self-expanding patent foramen ovale occlusion device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 47: 370–376.Google Scholar
Zahn EM, Wilson N, Cutright W, Latson LA. Development and testing of the Helex septal occluder, a new expanded polytetrafluoroethylene atrial septal defect occlusion system. Circulation 2001; 104: 711–716.Google Scholar
Hausdorf G, Kaulitz R, Paul T, Carminati M, Lock J. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with a new flexible, self-centering device (the STARFlex Occluder). Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1113–1116, A10.Google Scholar
Amin Z, Hijazi ZM, Bass JL, Cheatham JP, Hellenbrand WE, Kleinman CS. Erosion of Amplatzer septal occluder device after closure of secundum atrial septal defects: review of registry of complications and recommendations to minimize future risk. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 496–502.Google Scholar
Preventza O, Sampath-Kumar S, Wasnick J, Gold JP. Late cardiac perforation following transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1435–1437.Google Scholar
Willfort-Ehringer A, Ahmadi R, Gruber D, et al. Arterial remodeling and hemodynamics in carotid stents: a prospective duplex ultrasound study over 2 years. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 728–734.Google Scholar
Drachman DE, Simon DI. Inflammation as a mechanism and therapeutic target for in-stent restenosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2005; 7: 44–49.Google Scholar
Duke C, Rosenthal E, Qureshi SA. The efficacy and safety of stent redilatation in congenital heart disease. Heart 2003; 89: 905–912.Google Scholar
McMahon CJ, El-Said HG, Grifka RG, Fraley JK, Nihill MR, Mullins CE. Redilation of endovascular stents in congenital heart disease: factors implicated in the development of restenosis and neointimal proliferation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 521–526.Google Scholar
Gibbs JL. Treatment options for coarctation of the aorta. Heart 2000; 84: 11–13.Google Scholar
Pedra CA, Fontes VF, Esteves CA, et al. Stenting vs. balloon angioplasty for discrete unoperated coarctation of the aorta in adolescents and adults. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 495–506.Google Scholar
Grube E, Sonoda S, Ikeno F, et al. Six- and twelve-month results from first human experience using everolimus-eluting stents with bioabsorbable polymer. Circulation 2004; 109: 2168–2171.Google Scholar
Kollum M, Farb A, Schreiber R, et al. Particle debris from a nanoporous stent coating obscures potential antiproliferative effects of tacrolimus-eluting stents in a porcine model of restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 85–90.Google Scholar
Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Farb A. Drug-eluting stents: are they really safe? Am Heart Hosp J 2004; 2: 85–88.Google Scholar
McFadden EP, Stabile E, Regar E, et al. Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Lancet 2004; 364: 1519–1521.Google Scholar
Stack RS, Califf RM, Phillips HR, et al. Interventional cardiac catheterization at Duke Medical Center. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62 (10 Pt 2): 3F–24F.Google Scholar
Susawa T, Shiraki K, Shimizu Y. Biodegradable intracoronary stents in adult dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 483A.Google Scholar
van der Giessen WJ, Lincoff AM, Schwartz RS, et al. Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 1996; 94: 1690–1697.Google Scholar
Tamai H, Igaki K, Kyo E, et al. Initial and 6-month results of biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stents in humans. Circulation 2000; 102: 399–404.Google Scholar
Venkatraman S, Poh TL, Vinalia T, Mak KH, Boey F. Collapse pressures of biodegradable stents. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2105–2111.Google Scholar
Peuster M, Kaese V, Wuensch G, et al. Composition and in vitro biocompatibility of dissolving tungsten coils. J Biomedical Materials Res (Appl Biomaterials) 2003; 65B: 211–216.Google Scholar
Peuster M, Fink C, Wohlsein P, et al. Degradation of tungsten coils implanted into the subclavian artery of New Zealand white rabbits is not associated with local or systemic toxicity. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 393–399.Google Scholar
Peuster M, Fink C, von Schnakenburg C. Biocompatibility of corroding tungsten coils: in vitro assessment of degradation kinetics and cytotoxicity on human cells. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4057–4061.Google Scholar
Peuster M, Wohlsein P, Brügmann M, et al. A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal. Results 6 to 18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits. Heart 2001; 86: 563–569.Google Scholar
Peeters P, Bosiers M, Verbist J, Deloose K, Heublein B. Preliminary results after application of absorbable metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12: 1–5.Google Scholar
Heublein B, Rohde R, Kaese V, Niemeyer M, Hartung W, Haverich A. Biocorrosion of magnesium alloys: a new principle in cardiovascular implant technology? Heart 2003; 89: 651–656.Google Scholar
Ji YJ, Cui MZ. Beijing Institute of Labour Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, China. Toxicological studies on safety of rare earths used in agriculture. Biomed Environ Sci 1988; 1: 270–276.Google Scholar
Uo M, Sjogren G, Sundh A, Watari F, Bergman M, Lerner U. Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 487–492. Erratum in: Dent Mater 2003; 19: 574.Google Scholar
Jux C, Wohlsein P, Bruegmann M, Zutz M, Franzbach B, Bertram H. A new biological matrix for septal occlusion. J Interv Cardiol 2003; 16: 149–152.Google Scholar