Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-kxkpx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T20:56:34.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is the best surgical strategy for aortic valve disease in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2025

Zhangwei Wang Open the ORCID record for Zhangwei Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
Honghao Fu  and
Shoujun Li
Zhangwei Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China
Honghao Fu
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China
Shoujun Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China
*
Corresponding author: Shoujun Li; Email: beijing348@qq.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aortic valve disease in children is a hot topic in the field of cardiac surgery. The surgical treatment of aortic valve disease in children is affected by age, severity of the disease, and technology. The main purpose of surgical repair is to improve the symptoms of children and avoid or delay prosthetic valve replacement and reoperation as much as possible. At the same time, surgical repair should take into account the sustainability of the surgical effect and the growth ability of the aortic valve after surgery. At present, there is still a lack of a consistent surgical treatment concept and a universal surgical treatment strategy. Based on the current published literature, we conclude that for children younger than 1 year, valve repair is the first choice to avoid premature valve replacement. However, for experienced medical centres and surgeons, the Ross procedure can be attempted to treat aortic valve disease in children younger than 1 year and the long-term effect is comparable to aortic repair. In children older than 1 year, overall outcomes were similar with repair and the Ross procedure. When an acceptable intraoperative result was achieved, the outcomes of repair were favourable. However, when the intraoperative result of repair was suboptimal, the Ross procedure showed better results. For patients with suboptimal aortic valve repair, contraindications to the Ross procedure, and unwillingness to take anticoagulants, Ozaki procedure may also be an option to delay mechanical valve replacement. Compared with aortic valve repair and the Ross procedure, mechanical or homograft aortic valve replacement has a poor prognosis and is considered as a last resort option for surgical treatment of aortic valve disease in children. This article reviews the current status, advantages and disadvantages, and suitable population of several different surgical procedures for aortic valve disease in children.

Keywords

Aortic valve repairOzaki procedureRoss procedureaortic valve replacementaortic valve diseasepaediatric

Information

Type
Review
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 35 , Issue 9 , September 2025 , pp. 1766 - 1772
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Zhangwei Wang and Honghao Fu contributed equally to this work.

References

Kulshrestha, K, Greenberg, JW, Kennedy, JR, et al. National experience with pediatric surgical aortic valve repair: a pediatric health information system analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 167: 422–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hao, Zhang, Keming, Yang, Xinxin, Chen, Nianguo, Dong, Shoujun, Li. National society of congenital heart diseases. Chinese expert consensus on surgical treatment of aortic valve disease in children. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 31: 1560–1566.Google Scholar
Saleeb, SF, Solowiejczyk, DE, Glickstein, JS, Korsin, R, Gersony, WM, Hsu, DT. Frequency of development of aortic cuspal prolapse and aortic regurgitation in patients with subaortic ventricular septal defect diagnosed at <1 year of age. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1588–1592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlein, J, Kaider, A, Gabriel, H, et al. Aortic valve repair in pediatric patients: 30 years single center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115: 656–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prijic, SM, Vukomanovic, VA, Stajevic, MS, et al. Balloon dilation and surgical valvotomy comparison in non-critical congenital aortic valve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 2015; 36: 616–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergnat, M, Asfour, B, Arenz, C, et al. Aortic stenosis of the neonate: a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 318–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyamoto, T, Sinzobahamvya, N, Wetter, J, et al. Twenty years experience of surgical aortic valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in early infancy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 35–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Udekem, Y, Siddiqui, J, Seaman, CS, et al. Long-term results of a strategy of aortic valve repair in the pediatric population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 461–467. 467–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 1967; 2: 956–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazine, A, David, TE, Stoklosa, K, Chung, J, Lafreniere-Roula, M, Ouzounian, M. Improved outcomes following the ross procedure compared with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79: 993–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yokoyama, Y, Kuno, T, Toyoda, N, et al. Ross procedure versus mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a network meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12: e8066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Hamamsy, I, Eryigit, Z, Stevens, LM, et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 524–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donald, JS, Wallace, F, Naimo, PS, et al. Ross operation in children: 23-year experience from a single institution. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 109: 1251–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, G, Gill, G, Zubair, MM, et al. Ross procedure in children: the society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115: 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, JW, Argo, M, Ashfaq, A, et al. Long-term outcomes following the ross procedure in neonates and infants: a multi-institutional analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 168: 1720–1730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozaki, S, Kawase, I, Yamashita, H, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction using self-developed aortic valve plasty system in aortic valve disease. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12: 550–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, CW, Cooney, B, Chavez, M, Sleeper, LA, Marx, GR, Del, NP. Congenital aortic and truncal valve reconstruction using the ozaki technique: short-term clinical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161: 1567–1577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, LM, Mimic, B, Issitt, R, et al. The utility of aortic valve leaflet reconstruction techniques in children and young adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 159: 2369–2378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marathe, SP, Chavez, M, Sleeper, LA, Marx, G, Del, NP, Baird, CW. Modified ozaki procedure including annular enlargement for small aortic annuli in young patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110: 1364–1371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, GX, Zhang, S, Ma, K, et al. Ozaki technique versus ross operation for complex aortic valve diseases in children: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2025; 111: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, Jiang, Q, Liu, Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of aortic valve replacement in children with ross and ozaki procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2025; 67: ezaf088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marathe, SP, Chavez, M, Sleeper, LA, et al. Single-leaflet aortic valve reconstruction utilizing the ozaki technique in patients with congenital aortic valve disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 34: 1262–1272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polito, A, Albanese, SB, Cetrano, E, Cicenia, M, Rinelli, G, Carotti, A. Aortic valve neocuspidalization in paediatric patients with isolated aortic valve disease: early experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 32: 111–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicek, M, Ozdemir, F. Aortic valve neocuspidization with the ozaki procedure in congenital aortic valve disease: early results. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg 2023; 31: 431–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, J, Zhang, W, Jia, B, et al. A midterm follow-up study of the application of a confluent aortic valve neocuspidization technique with pericardium in children. Transl Pediatr 2023; 12: 1981–1991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalezi, ZE, Simbila, AN, Mongella, S, et al. Outcomes post ozaki procedure among children with aortic valve disease at jakaya kikwete cardiac institute, dar es salaam, tanzania: a retrospective descriptive study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024; 24: 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivalingam, S, Haranal, MY, See, WS. Factors predicting early outcome of aortic valve neocuspidization in the pediatric population. Pediatr Cardiol 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00246-025-03808-6. Epub ahead of print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, PO, Mokashi, SA, Horgan, E, et al. Outcomes after mechanical aortic valve replacement in children and young adults with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etnel, JR, Elmont, LC, Ertekin, E, et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buratto, E, Konstantinov, IE. Aortic valve surgery in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; S0022-5223: 32235-2.Google Scholar
Sharabiani, MT, Dorobantu, DM, Mahani, AS, et al. Aortic valve replacement and the ross operation in children and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 2858–2870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukushima, S, Tesar, PJ, Pearse, B, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement using cryopreserved aortic allograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, JS, Maul, TM, Wearden, PD, Pasquali, SK, Romano, JC. National practice patterns and early outcomes of aortic valve replacement in children and teens. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108: 544–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, RK, Pasquali, SK, Jacobs, ML, et al. Aortic valve replacement in neonates and infants: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 1084–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Xie, Zhuheng, Wu, Jingyu, Liu, Ke, Dian. Short- to mid-term outcomes of aortic valve plasty versus Ross procedure in children with severe aortic valve disease: a retrospective cohort study. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 31: 1794–1802.Google Scholar
Zhu, M, Konstantinov, IE, Wu, DM, Wallace, F, Brizard, CP, Buratto, E. Aortic valve repair versus the ross procedure in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166: 1279–1288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polito, A, Albanese, SB, Cetrano, E, et al. Aortic valve neocuspidalization may be a viable alternative to ross operation in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42: 668–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed