Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T02:49:11.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prioritising gaps in care in the real-life journey of single ventricle CHD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2025

Maria E. Hoyos*
Affiliation:
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA UT Health Austin and Dell Children’s Medical Center, Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Austin, TX, USA
Mario O’Connor
Affiliation:
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA UT Health Austin and Dell Children’s Medical Center, Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Austin, TX, USA
Carlos M. Mery
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
Kathleen Carberry
Affiliation:
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Alexandra Lamari-Fisher
Affiliation:
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA UT Health Austin and Dell Children’s Medical Center, Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Austin, TX, USA
Eileen Steward
Affiliation:
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA UT Health Austin and Dell Children’s Medical Center, Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Austin, TX, USA
Christine Dillingham
Affiliation:
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA UT Health Austin and Dell Children’s Medical Center, Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Austin, TX, USA
Charles D. Fraser
Affiliation:
Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA UT Health Austin and Dell Children’s Medical Center, Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Austin, TX, USA
Andrew Well
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
*
Corresponding author: Maria E. Hoyos; Email: me.hoyos@utexas.edu

Abstract

Background:

Single ventricle CHD requires lifelong care, yet its broader impact on patients and families remains unclear. Engaging patients in care improvement can strengthen relationships and outcomes.

Objectives:

This study evaluates how individuals with single ventricle CHD prioritise gaps in care based on personal and family impact.

Methods:

Using Mery et al.’s identified care gaps, a survey was distributed to parents of children with single ventricle CHD and adults with single ventricle CHD in English or Spanish. Participants rated each gap from 1(not important) to 10(extremely important), with a “Not Applicable” option. Responses were analysed using median, weighted, and total rating scores. Sociodemographic data were examined, and univariate analysis and a race/ethnicity and insurance matrix were conducted on parent responses.

Results:

Among 36 complete responses, 30(83.3%) were parents and 6(16.7%) patients. Most parents were female(29,96.7%), White non-Hispanic(24,80.0%), with 17(6.7%) having privately insured children. Median child age was 6.5[interquartile range: 3.0–12.8] years, and 55.3% had Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. The highest-rated gap was “Uncertainty of prognosis in adulthood” (9.5[interquartile range: 8.0–10.0]). The lowest was “Pregnancy termination presented repeatedly” (1.0[interquartile range: 1.0–7.0]). Non-White parents rated “Transition to adult healthcare” (p = 0.017) and “Navigating resources” (p = 0.037) higher. Patients (median age 33.0 years) prioritised “Rescheduling surgical procedures” and “Transition to adult healthcare” (both 10.0). “Support in family planning” had the highest total rating score(12). The lowest-rated was “Limited guidance on transition to adolescence” (0.0[interquartile range:0.0–0.0]).

Conclusions:

Patients and families prioritise care gaps differently. Aligning their perspectives with clinical expertise can guide tailored solutions to improve outcomes for single ventricle CHD patients.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dalén, M, Odermarsky, M, Liuba, P, Johansson Ramgren, J, Synnergren, M, Sunnegårdh, J. Long-term survival after single-ventricle palliation: a swedish nationwide cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13: e031722. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pundi, KN, Johnson, JN, Dearani, JA, et al. 40-year follow-up after the fontan operation: long-term outcomes of 1,052 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 17001710. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, VM, Sorabella, RA, Padilla, LA, et al. Health-related quality of life after single ventricle palliation or tetralogy of fallot repair. Pediatr Cardiol 2023; 44: 95101. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02958-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Well, A, Lamari-Fisher, A, Taylor, K, et al. Experiences and insights from partners of individuals with single-ventricle CHD: a pilot qualitative research study. Cardiol Young 2023; 33: 20162020. doi: 10.1017/S1047951122003882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyos, ME, Well, A, Van Diest, H, et al. Navigating life with single-ventricle CHD: psychosocial needs across adulthood. Cardiol Young 2024; 18: 18. doi: 10.1017/S1047951124036084.Google Scholar
Mery, CM, Well, A, Taylor, K, et al. Examining the real-life journey of individuals and families affected by single-ventricle congenital heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12: e027556. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teisberg, E, Wallace, S, O’Hara, S. Defining and implementing value-based health care: a strategic framework. Acad Med 2020; 95: 682685. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulack, C, Suarez, J, Brown, L, Ring, D, Wallace, S, Teisberg, E. What are people that seek care for rotator cuff tendinopathy experiencing in their daily life? J Patient Exp 2022; 9: 23743735211069811. doi: 10.1177/23743735211069811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, T, Reihlen, M. Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 110: 107652. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krist, AH, Tong, ST, Aycock, RA, Longo, DR. Engaging patients in decision-making and behavior change to promote prevention. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 240 ( 2 ): 284302.Google ScholarPubMed
Rstudio Team. 2020, RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL. Published online 2020. http://www.rstudio.com/ Google Scholar
Benner, P, Hughes, RG, Sutphen, M. Clinical Reasoning, Decisionmaking, and Action: Thinking Critically and Clinically. In: Hughes, RG (ed). Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Advances in Patient Safety. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2008. Accessed November 27, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2643/ Google Scholar
Levesque, JF, Sutherland, K. Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 23. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, MR, Smith, DM, Twigg, E, Guerrero, R, Wittkowski, A. Children with single ventricle congenital heart defects: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the lived parent experience. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2020; 59: 101297. doi: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2020.101297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, NA, Ghanayem, NS, Hill, GD, et al. Interstage home monitoring for infants with single ventricle heart disease:Education and Management. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9: e014548. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, AS, Downing, KF, Nembhard, WN, Oster, ME, Farr, SL. Racial and ethnic disparities in socio-economic status, access to care, and healthcare utilisation among children with heart conditions, national survey of children’s health 2016-2019. Cardiol Young 2023; 33: 25392547. doi: 10.1017/S1047951122004097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, BW, Puri, NK, Trzeciak, CJ, Mazzarelli, AJ, Trzeciak, S. Socioeconomic, racial and ethnic differences in patient experience of clinician empathy: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2021; 16: e0247259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, DR, Priest, N, Anderson, N. Understanding associations between race, socioeconomic status and health: patterns and prospects. Health Psychol 2016; 35: 407411. doi: 10.1037/hea0000242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arpey, NC, Gaglioti, AH, Rosenbaum, ME. How socioeconomic status affects patient perceptions of health care: a qualitative study. J Prim Care Community Health 2017; 8: 169175. doi: 10.1177/2150131917697439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dib, N, Poirier, N, Samuel, M, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes associated with hypoplastic left heart syndrome versus other types of single right ventricle: a multicenter study. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13: e034757. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabrera Fernandez, DL, Lopez, KN, Bravo-Jaimes, K, Mackie, AS. The impact of social determinants of health on transition from pediatric to adult cardiology care. Can J Cardiol 2024; 40: 10431055. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.03.023.Google ScholarPubMed
Agha, MM, Glazier, RH, Moineddin, R, Moore, AM, Guttmann, A. Socioeconomic status and prevalence of congenital heart defects: does universal access to health care system eliminate the gap? Birt Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011; 91: 10111018. doi: 10.1002/bdra.22857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, P, King-Shier, K, Sinclair, S. The colours and contours of compassion: a systematic review of the perspectives of compassion among ethnically diverse patients and healthcare providers. PLoS ONE 2018; 13: e0197261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khatri, UG, Nguemeni Tiako, MJ, Gebreyesus, A, Reid, A, Jacoby, SF, South, EC. “A lack of empathy:” a qualitative study of black people seeking treatment for opioid use disorder. SSM - Qual Res Health 2023; 4: 100298. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvola, S, Restelli, U, Bonfanti, M, Croce, D. Co-design as enabling factor for patient-centred healthcare: a bibliometric literature review. Clin Outcomes Res CEOR 2023; 15: 333347. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S403243.Google ScholarPubMed
Pelletier, LR, Beaudin, CL, van Leeuwen, D. The use of a prioritization matrix to preserve quality resources. J Healthc Qual 1999; 21: 3638. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1999.tb00989.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkins, B, Briffa, T, Connell, C, Buttery, AK, Jennings, GLR. Improving prioritization processes for clinical practice guidelines: new methods and an evaluation from the national heart foundation of Australia. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21: 26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00953-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, LC, Ollson, CA, Stefanovic, IL. Prioritizing health: a systematic approach to scoping determinants in health impact assessment. Front Public Health 2016; 4: 170. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T., H, Heelon, M, Siano, B, et al. Medication safety improves after implementation of positive patient identification. Appl Clin Inform 2010; 1: 213220. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-02-RA-0011.Google ScholarPubMed
van Eeghen, C, Littenberg, B, Holman, MD, Kessler, R. Integrating behavioral health in primary care using lean workflow analysis: a case study. J Am Board Fam Med 2016; 29: 385393. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minchau, EA, Vance, BS, Barnes, E. Development of a transition program for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: a quality improvement initiative. Health Care Transit 2024; 2: 100073. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2024.100073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Hoyos et al. supplementary material 1

Hoyos et al. supplementary material
Download Hoyos et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 38.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hoyos et al. supplementary material 2

Hoyos et al. supplementary material
Download Hoyos et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 22.9 KB