Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T23:16:55.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13-year follow-up of total aortic cusp replacement for paediatric aortic valve regurgitation: a case report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2025

Toshi Maeda*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular surgery, Mt Fuji Shizuoka Children’s Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
Hiroki Ito
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular surgery, Mt Fuji Shizuoka Children’s Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
Keiichi Hirose
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular surgery, Mt Fuji Shizuoka Children’s Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Toshi Maeda; Email: tmsirius825@gmail.com

Abstract

Long-term results of total aortic cusp replacement such as the Ozaki procedure in paediatric patients have rarely been reported. We describe the 13-year follow-up of a 9-year-old boy with aortic valve regurgitation who underwent total aortic cusp replacement without the need for reintervention. His aortic valve regurgitation is mild with peak pressure gradient of 22 mmHg at the last follow-up.

Information

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ozaki, S, Kawase, I, Yamashita, H, Uchida, S, Takatoh, M, Kiyohara, N. Midterm outcomes after aortic valve neocuspidization with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155: 23792387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, LM, Mimic, B, Issitt, R, et al. The utility of aortic valve leaflet reconstruction techniques in children and young adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 159: 23692378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polito, A, Albanese, SB, Cetrano, E, et al. Aortic valve neocuspidization may be a viable alternative to Ross operation in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42: 668675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, CW, Cooney, B, Chávez, M, Sleeper, LA, Marx, GR, del Nido, PJ. Congenital aortic and truncal valve reconstruction using the Ozaki technique: short-term clinical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161: 15671577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergnat, M, Asfour, B, Arenz, C, et al. Aortic stenosis of the neonate: a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 318326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
d’Udekem, Y, Siddiqui, J, Seaman, CS, et al. Long-term results of a strategy of aortic valve repair in the pediatric population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 461469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaza, AK, Pigula, FA. Are bioprosthetic valves appropriate for aortic valve replacement in young patients? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Ann, 2016; 19: 6367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishidou, M, Ikai, A, Sakamoto, K. Truncal valve leaflet reconstruction with autologous pericardium in a neonate. Cardiol Young 2021; 32: 818820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishidou, M, Hirose, K, Ikai, A, Sakamoto, K. Open-sleeve technique: a new approach for aortic valve leaflet reconstruction in small children. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2022; 30: 729732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secinaro, A, Milano, EG, Ciancarella, P, et al. Blood flow characteristics after aortic valve neocuspidization in paediatric patients: a comparison with the Ross procedure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 23: 275282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Maeda et al. supplementary material 1

Maeda et al. supplementary material
Download Maeda et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 11.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Maeda et al. supplementary material 2

Maeda et al. supplementary material
Download Maeda et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Maeda et al. supplementary material 3

Maeda et al. supplementary material
Download Maeda et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 1.7 MB